Leandro Riedi vs Tomas Machac — Helsinki CH Final

Helsinki CH · CHALLENGER · Final
Leandro Riedi
SUI
Leandro Riedi
#134ATP
1693ELO
1675Hard ELO
$193kYTD
$1.2MCAREER
24 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WLLLWWLLWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 14 November 2022
hard
Tomas Machac
CZE5
Tomas Machac
#53ATP
1866ELO
1829Hard ELO
$832kYTD
$6.8MCAREER
25 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLWWLWW
Riedi L.
6-3 6-1
Machac T.
Riedi L.
662
Machac T.
310

Leandro Riedi defeated Tomas Machac 6-3 6-1 in the Helsinki CH final on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Tomas Machac came in ranked #53.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Riedi L.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Machac T.

Machac T.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Riedi L.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Riedi L.Machac T.
—
Serve
30
—
Return
25

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Riedi L.Machac T.
1st serve in·Even
61%
62%
1st serve points won·Even
72%
70%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
54%
Service points won·Even
64%
64%
Return points won·Even
38%
38%
Break points saved·Even
64%
62%
Aces / match·Even
5.6
5.0
Double faults / match·Slight edge
3.2
2.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (173 vs 199). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Riedi L.Machac T.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
63
90
Break points saved·Even
94
98
Break points won·Dominant
14
80
Deciding sets·Slight edge
85
94
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
92
97

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Riedi L.
5.4
Clear underdogUmpiry Score
Machac T.
6.7
Slight advantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
3.4Hard Elo 1675
Surface ELO
6.6+154 Hard Elo edge
3.5Overall Elo 1693
ELO gap
6.5Overall Elo 1866
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
4.0
Surface form
5.4
0.0Lost last 3
Win streak
7.03-match win streak
Fatigue & Travel
8.6
Minutes 14d
4.3
7.0
3-set count
4.0
7.0
Prev. match
7.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Riedi L.
Machac T.[5]
6-36-1
Semi-finals
Machac T.[5]
Hanfmann Y.
6-16-2
Riedi L.
Sels J.[8]
6-36-756-4
Quarter-finals
Machac T.[5]
Bergs Z.
6-16-2
Sels J.[8]
Andreev A.
6-36-4
Riedi L.
Kuzmanov D.
6-46-2
Hanfmann Y.
Kukushkin M.
6-46-1
R16
Machac T.[5]
Virtanen O.
6-46-2
Riedi L.
Marterer M.
7-656-2
Kuzmanov D.
Celikbilek A.
6-46-3
Hanfmann Y.
Peniston R.
6-36-4
Sels J.[8]
Brancaccio R.
4-66-36-2
Andreev A.
Bellucci M.
7-53-67-62
Kukushkin M.
Karlovskiy E.
6-24-2
Bergs Z.
Shevchenko A.
6-43-67-62
R32
Celikbilek A.
Kotov P.[1]
7-677-65
Brancaccio R.
Laaksonen H.
6-36-3
Kukushkin M.
Travaglia S.
6-26-4
Sels J.[8]
Kopriva V.
6-36-756-3
Marterer M.
Ymer E.[7]
6-17-66
Karlovskiy E.
Ritschard A.
7-676-3
Shevchenko A.
Krutykh O.
6-26-3
Bergs Z.
Van Rijthoven T.[3]
7-696-1
Bellucci M.
Gombos N.[4]
4-67-636-1
Riedi L.
Mpetshi Perricard G.
6-16-4
Peniston R.
Saatela L.
6-06-4
Machac T.[5]
Kachmazov A.
7-646-4
Kuzmanov D.
Gaston H.
6-36-3
Andreev A.
Clarke J.
6-13-67-62
Virtanen O.
Lofman A.
6-17-5
Hanfmann Y.
Andujar P.[6]
6-36-4