Christopher Eubanks vs Tennys Sandgren — Champaign CH Round of 16

Champaign CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
USA3
Christopher Eubanks
#788ATP
1523ELO
1493Hard ELO
30 yrs · 201 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWWLWLLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 14 November 2022
hard
USA
Tennys Sandgren
34 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLWWWWW
Eubanks C.
6-4 6-3
Sandgren T.
Eubanks C.
662
Sandgren T.
430

Christopher Eubanks defeated Tennys Sandgren 6-4 6-3 in the Champaign CH round of 16 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Eubanks C.serving90% hold

wins 70% of points on serve vs Sandgren T.

Sandgren T.serving91% hold

wins 71% of points on serve vs Eubanks C.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Eubanks C.Sandgren T.
1st serve in·Slight edge
68%
60%
1st serve points won·Even
74%
75%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
50%
Service points won·Even
67%
65%
Return points won·Even
33%
36%
Break points saved·Even
64%
60%
Aces / match·Clear edge
10.4
8.3
Double faults / match·Slight edge
3.2
2.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 117). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Eubanks C.Sandgren T.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
50
36
Break points saved·Even
96
92
Break points won·Even
3
2
Deciding sets·Dominant
67
28
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
74
86

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Eubanks C.
7.2
Strong advantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Sandgren T.
6.5
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
10.0No prior meetings
H2H
0.0
8.1
Surface form
7.5
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
0.0
Minutes 14d
7.0
0.0
3-set count
7.0
9.0
Prev. match
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Shelton B.[4]
Vukic A.[6]
0-66-36-2
Semi-finals
Shelton B.[4]
Kovacevic A.[7]
6-736-26-4
Vukic A.[6]
Eubanks C.[3]
7-676-4
Quarter-finals
Kovacevic A.[7]
Johnson S.[2]
6-36-4
Shelton B.[4]
Gunneswaran P.
6-37-5
Eubanks C.[3]
Zhu E.
6-16-2
Vukic A.[6]
Alvarez Varona N.
7-666-4
R16
Johnson S.[2]
Gerch L.
4-66-36-4
Kovacevic A.[7]
Escobedo E.
3-66-46-2
Zhu E.
Kirchheimer S.
6-47-63
Eubanks C.[3]
Sandgren T.
6-46-3
Shelton B.[4]
Quinn E.
6-46-4
Vukic A.[6]
Kypson P.
6-46-2
Gunneswaran P.
Fanselow S.
3-66-27-5
Alvarez Varona N.
Holmgren A.
6-47-63
R32
Johnson S.[2]
Heck H.
6-716-36-2
Gunneswaran P.
Kozlov S.[5]
3-66-36-4
Kirchheimer S.
Shang J.[8]
7-676-4
Sandgren T.
Lock B.
3-66-16-0
Kovacevic A.[7]
Ayeni O.
7-57-5
Escobedo E.
Svajda Z.
6-13-66-3
Holmgren A.
Jubb P.
1-66-36-4
Gerch L.
Chappell N.
6-36-4
Zhu E.
Petrov A.
6-06-4
Shelton B.[4]
Ozolins K.
6-36-4
Fanselow S.
Clark E.
6-16-1
Kypson P.
Montes De La Torre I.
6-16-4
Vukic A.[6]
Mchugh A.
6-26-4
Eubanks C.[3]
Walton A.
6-36-3
Alvarez Varona N.
Kudla D.[1]
7-617-66