Vasek Pospisil vs Antoine Escoffier — Drummondville CH Semi-final

Drummondville CH · CHALLENGER · Semi-final
CAN3
Vasek Pospisil
36 yrs · 193 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLWLLLL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 14 November 2022
hard
FRA6
Antoine Escoffier
#753ATP
1436ELO
1413Hard ELO
34 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWWWLWLL
Pospisil V.
6-3 3-6 6-3
Escoffier A.
Pospisil V.
6362
Escoffier A.
3631

Vasek Pospisil defeated Antoine Escoffier 6-3 3-6 6-3 in the Drummondville CH semi-final on hard.

Key context

  • Match story: Vasek Pospisil closed it out in three sets, 6–3 3–6 6–3.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Pospisil V.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Escoffier A.

Escoffier A.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Pospisil V.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Pospisil V.Escoffier A.
1st serve in·Even
56%
57%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
78%
72%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
48%
Service points won·Even
65%
62%
Return points won·Even
36%
39%
Break points saved·Slight edge
65%
60%
Aces / match·Dominant
9.6
5.1
Double faults / match·Slight edge
4.2
3.9

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (111 vs 198). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Pospisil V.Escoffier A.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
49
10
Break points saved·Dominant
96
68
Break points won·Slight edge
7
18
Deciding sets·Dominant
62
12
Tiebreaks·Dominant
72
3

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Pospisil V.
6.9
Slight advantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Escoffier A.
6.0
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
10.0No prior meetings
H2H
0.0
6.0
Surface form
5.8
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
7.2
Minutes 14d
6.9
3-set count
7.0
9.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Pospisil V.[3]
Mmoh M.[2]
7-654-66-4
Semi-finals
Mmoh M.[2]
Geerts M.
6-26-0
Pospisil V.[3]
Escoffier A.[6]
6-33-66-3
Quarter-finals
Escoffier A.[6]
Dougaz A.
6-7137-657-62
Mmoh M.[2]
Broom C.
6-07-5
Pospisil V.[3]
Mayot H.
6-37-63
Geerts M.
Galarneau A.[7]
6-33-66-1
R16
Mmoh M.[2]
Kasnikowski M.
6-37-5
Galarneau A.[7]
Boulais J.
6-26-1
Mayot H.
Horvat R.
7-56-0
Escoffier A.[6]
Oradini G.
6-46-4
Dougaz A.
Gomez E.[1]
7-636-1
Pospisil V.[3]
Blanch U.
6-46-3
Geerts M.
Baadi T.
2-67-686-4
Broom C.
Diallo G.
6-46-2
R32
Broom C.
Rehberg M.
6-41-0
Mmoh M.[2]
Vacherot V.
7-56-2
Kasnikowski M.
Mansouri S.
6-47-5
Diallo G.
Wehnelt K.
6-47-66
Geerts M.
Ficovich J.[4]
7-6104-67-5
Pospisil V.[3]
Draxl L.
6-16-2
Oradini G.
Stakusic M.
7-615-76-0
Dougaz A.
Smith R.
6-24-66-2
Gomez E.[1]
Mejia N.
6-36-3
Baadi T.
Jaziri M.
6-32-66-4
Galarneau A.[7]
Decamps G.
3-66-27-67
Escoffier A.[6]
Ocleppo J.
7-637-5
Mayot H.
Neuchrist M.
6-46-3
Blanch U.
Lapadat J.
6-26-2
Horvat R.
Frantzen C.
7-636-1
Boulais J.
Leshem E.
7-636-3