Sebastian Fanselow vs Ezekiel Clark — Champaign CH Round of 32

Champaign CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
GER
Sebastian Fanselow
#1187ATP
34 yrs · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLLLWLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 14 November 2022
hard
USA
Ezekiel Clark
#1280ATP
27 yrs · 170 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWLLLLWLLW
Fanselow S.
6-1 6-1
Clark E.
Fanselow S.
662
Clark E.
110

Sebastian Fanselow defeated Ezekiel Clark 6-1 6-1 in the Champaign CH round of 32 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Fanselow S.serving70% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Clark E.

Clark E.serving71% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Fanselow S.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Fanselow S.Clark E.
1st serve in·Clear edge
56%
68%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
68%
60%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
47%
Service points won·Even
59%
56%
Return points won·Even
37%
40%
Break points saved·Even
57%
54%
Aces / match·Clear edge
3.7
1.4
Double faults / match·Slight edge
3.5
2.9

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (126 vs 38). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Fanselow S.
5.0
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Clark E.
5.7
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
0.0
Surface form
2.9
0.0Lost last 8
Win streak
0.0Lost last 2
Fatigue & Travel
7.7
Minutes 14d
7.8
7.0
3-set count
7.0
Prev. match
8.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Shelton B.[4]
Vukic A.[6]
0-66-36-2
Semi-finals
Shelton B.[4]
Kovacevic A.[7]
6-736-26-4
Vukic A.[6]
Eubanks C.[3]
7-676-4
Quarter-finals
Kovacevic A.[7]
Johnson S.[2]
6-36-4
Shelton B.[4]
Gunneswaran P.
6-37-5
Eubanks C.[3]
Zhu E.
6-16-2
Vukic A.[6]
Alvarez Varona N.
7-666-4
R16
Johnson S.[2]
Gerch L.
4-66-36-4
Kovacevic A.[7]
Escobedo E.
3-66-46-2
Zhu E.
Kirchheimer S.
6-47-63
Eubanks C.[3]
Sandgren T.
6-46-3
Shelton B.[4]
Quinn E.
6-46-4
Vukic A.[6]
Kypson P.
6-46-2
Gunneswaran P.
Fanselow S.
3-66-27-5
Alvarez Varona N.
Holmgren A.
6-47-63
R32
Johnson S.[2]
Heck H.
6-716-36-2
Gunneswaran P.
Kozlov S.[5]
3-66-36-4
Kirchheimer S.
Shang J.[8]
7-676-4
Sandgren T.
Lock B.
3-66-16-0
Kovacevic A.[7]
Ayeni O.
7-57-5
Escobedo E.
Svajda Z.
6-13-66-3
Holmgren A.
Jubb P.
1-66-36-4
Gerch L.
Chappell N.
6-36-4
Zhu E.
Petrov A.
6-06-4
Shelton B.[4]
Ozolins K.
6-36-4
Fanselow S.
Clark E.
6-16-1
Kypson P.
Montes De La Torre I.
6-16-4
Vukic A.[6]
Mchugh A.
6-26-4
Eubanks C.[3]
Walton A.
6-36-3
Alvarez Varona N.
Kudla D.[1]
7-617-66