Yuta Shimizu vs Yusuke Takahashi — Matsuyama CH Qualifying Round 1
Matsuyama CH · CHALLENGER · Qualifying Round 1
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 7 November 2022
hard
Umpiry Score
Pre-match6.9
Slight advantageUmpiry Score5.8
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScoreForm & Matchup
6.9+149 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO3.1Hard Elo 1248
6.9Overall Elo 1428
ELO gap3.1Overall Elo 1273
5.0
H2H5.0
6.3
Surface form5.6
Fatigue & Travel
7.3
Minutes 14d4.3
4.0
3-set count4.0
7.0
Prev. match7.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts5.0
The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.
Shimizu Y.
5662
Takahashi Y.
7011
Head to head
4–0| Date | Tournament | Round | Surface | Winner | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-04-27 | Jiujiang CH | Q2 | hard | Yuta Shimizu | 7-6(6) 6-2 |
| 2025-11-17 | Yokohama CH | R32 | hard | Yuta Shimizu | 6-2 6-2 |
| 2018-09-10 | Shanghai CH | Q1 | hard | Yuta Shimizu | 3-6 6-2 7-5 |
| 2018-09-03 | Zhangjiagang CH | Q3 | hard | Yuta Shimizu | 6-4 6-2 |
Statistics
Recent form64%1st serve in+3%67%
68%1st serve points won+2%66%
52%2nd serve points won+1%51%
62%Service points won+1%61%
37%Return points won37%
59%Break points saved+3%62%
4.7Aces / match+22.7
2.1Double faults / match+0.51.6
Averages from each player's recent completed matches (20 vs 20). ATP, WTA & Challenger.
Draw — qualifying
Q2
Matsuda K.
Shimizu Y.[5]
6-06-3
Hong S.[3]
Hazawa S.
6-36-4
Jung J.[6]
Nam J.[8]
6-36-4
Kirkin E.[4]
Nakagawa N.[7]
4-66-26-1
Sekiguchi S.
Ochi M.[10]
7-57-5
Mukund S.[2]
Kawakami R.[9]
6-26-2
Q1
Jung J.[6]
Nakagawa S.
6-16-1
Mukund S.[2]
Saitoh K.
6-36-2
Hazawa S.
Mochizuki Y.[12]
1-67-666-2
Matsuda K.
Kadhe A.[11]
7-616-2
Sekiguchi S.
Zhukayev B.[1]
4-66-37-63
Hong S.[3]
Otsuka K.
6-06-1
Shimizu Y.[5]
Takahashi Y.
5-76-06-1
Nam J.[8]
Mridha J.
7-626-3
Kirkin E.[4]
Tokuda R.
4-66-37-5
Kawakami R.[9]
KOMODA N.
6-06-3
Ochi M.[10]
Danilov S.
6-46-4
Nakagawa N.[7]
Tanuma R.
6-36-4