Vasek Pospisil vs Valentin Vacherot — Calgary CH Round of 16

Calgary CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
CAN2
Vasek Pospisil
36 yrs · 193 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLWLLLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 7 November 2022
hard
Valentin Vacherot
MON
Valentin Vacherot
#21ATP
1903ELO
1852Hard ELO
$1.0MYTD
$3.5MCAREER
27 yrs · 193 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WLLWWWWLWW
Pospisil V.
7-6 6-3
Vacherot V.
Pospisil V.
7762
Vacherot V.
6330

Vasek Pospisil defeated Valentin Vacherot 7-6 6-3 in the Calgary CH round of 16 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Pospisil V.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Vacherot V.

Vacherot V.serving88% hold

wins 68% of points on serve vs Pospisil V.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Pospisil V.Vacherot V.
—
Serve
68
—
Return
23

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Pospisil V.Vacherot V.
1st serve in·Slight edge
56%
66%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
78%
72%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
53%
Service points won·Even
65%
65%
Return points won·Even
36%
38%
Break points saved·Even
65%
63%
Aces / match·Dominant
9.5
6.0
Double faults / match·Dominant
4.2
2.2

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (111 vs 199). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Pospisil V.Vacherot V.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
49
69
Break points saved·Even
96
96
Break points won·Dominant
7
33
Deciding sets·Dominant
62
95
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
72
66

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Pospisil V.
6.5
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Vacherot V.
5.8
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
6.4
Surface form
3.6
0.0Lost last 2
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
8.8
Minutes 14d
8.5
7.0
3-set count
7.0
7.0
Prev. match
7.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Koepfer D.[5]
Vukic A.[4]
6-26-4
Semi-finals
Vukic A.[4]
Kasnikowski M.
7-57-62
Koepfer D.[5]
Diallo G.
7-626-1
Quarter-finals
Vukic A.[4]
Galarneau A.[8]
6-37-64
Koepfer D.[5]
Mayot H.
7-603-66-3
Diallo G.
Escoffier A.[6]
6-35-77-5
Kasnikowski M.
Pospisil V.[2]
7-676-3
R16
Pospisil V.[2]
Vacherot V.
7-636-3
Vukic A.[4]
Broom C.
4-66-46-3
Galarneau A.[8]
Mansouri S.
6-36-4
Escoffier A.[6]
Decamps G.
7-56-3
Mayot H.
Pervolarakis M.
6-46-0
Koepfer D.[5]
Harper C.
6-46-1
Diallo G.
Ficovich J.[3]
6-36-2
Kasnikowski M.
Perez A.
6-46-4
R32
Kasnikowski M.
Holt B.[7]
6-43-67-5
Pospisil V.[2]
Zhu E.
6-36-4
Broom C.
Fery A.
3-66-36-4
Mansouri S.
Weekes J.
6-26-4
Harper C.
Rehberg M.
7-643-66-4
Pervolarakis M.
Jaziri M.
3-67-636-2
Escoffier A.[6]
Boulais J.
6-36-3
Diallo G.
Ocleppo J.
7-626-4
Koepfer D.[5]
Chappell N.
6-27-64
Vacherot V.
Geerts M.
6-44-66-1
Perez A.
Leshem E.
6-46-4
Vukic A.[4]
Lock B.
6-26-1
Galarneau A.[8]
Neuchrist M.
7-666-1
Ficovich J.[3]
Dougaz A.
7-626-2
Mayot H.
Gomez E.[1]
3-67-56-1
Decamps G.
Haerteis J.
7-56-4