Michael Mmoh vs Tennys Sandgren — Knoxville CH Quarter-final

Knoxville CH · CHALLENGER · Quarter-final
Michael Mmoh
USA1
Michael Mmoh
#188ATP
1613ELO
1599Hard ELO
$85kYTD
$2.4MCAREER
28 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLLLWWWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 7 November 2022
hard
USA
Tennys Sandgren
34 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLWWWWW
Mmoh M.
6-3 6-4
Sandgren T.
Mmoh M.
662
Sandgren T.
340

Michael Mmoh defeated Tennys Sandgren 6-3 6-4 in the Knoxville CH quarter-final on hard. Michael Mmoh extended the head-to-head to 2–1.

Key context

  • Match story: Michael Mmoh closed it out in two sets, 6–3 6–4.

Head to head

1–1
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2023-07-24AtlantaQ1hardMichael Mmoh4-6 7-6(8) 6-4
2017-07-03WimbledonQ1grassTennys Sandgren6-3 7-5

Serve vs return

This season
Mmoh M.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Sandgren T.

Sandgren T.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Mmoh M.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Mmoh M.Sandgren T.
1st serve in·Slight edge
65%
60%
1st serve points won·Even
71%
75%
2nd serve points won·Even
47%
50%
Service points won·Even
63%
65%
Return points won·Even
39%
36%
Break points saved·Even
62%
60%
Aces / match·Clear edge
5.9
8.3
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.8
2.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (199 vs 117). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Mmoh M.Sandgren T.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
66
36
Break points saved·Even
91
92
Break points won·Dominant
31
2
Deciding sets·Dominant
90
28
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
77
86

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Mmoh M.
7.3
Strong advantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Sandgren T.
6.6
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
10.0
H2H
0.0
8.0
Surface form
8.5
0.0
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
7.6
Minutes 14d
0.5
3-set count
0.0
7.0
Prev. match
8.0
Context
8.5
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Mmoh M.Sandgren T.
Freshness·
95
—

Mmoh M.: 13 days rest · 2 matches (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Shelton B.[4]
Eubanks C.[3]
6-31-67-64
Semi-finals
Shelton B.[4]
Couacaud E.[7]
6-736-46-4
Eubanks C.[3]
Mmoh M.[1]
6-727-56-2
Quarter-finals
Eubanks C.[3]
Gerch L.
6-36-2
Couacaud E.[7]
Kozlov S.[2]
6-37-5
Shelton B.[4]
Kovacevic A.[6]
7-56-4
Mmoh M.[1]
Sandgren T.
6-36-4
R16
Gerch L.
Jubb P.
5-77-626-4
Mmoh M.[1]
Blanch U.
7-56-3
Kovacevic A.[6]
Montes De La Torre I.
6-16-4
Couacaud E.[7]
Mchugh A.
6-46-2
Eubanks C.[3]
Kirchheimer S.
7-626-4
Kozlov S.[2]
Gunneswaran P.
6-46-3
Shelton B.[4]
Krueger M.
6-26-1
Sandgren T.
Svajda Z.
6-16-2
R32
Blanch U.
Mccormick T.
6-33-67-5
Sandgren T.
Nava E.[5]
7-666-3
Eubanks C.[3]
Alvarez Varona N.
6-46-2
Gunneswaran P.
Bicknell B.
6-16-2
Blanch U.
Mccormick T.
6-33-67-5
Krueger M.
Hussey G.
7-616-1
Kirchheimer S.
Brymer G.
6-36-1
Shelton B.[4]
Smith K.
4-66-46-3
Mmoh M.[1]
Bernard A.
6-06-0
Gerch L.
Shang J.[8]
6-47-63
Couacaud E.[7]
Clark E.
7-656-3
Mchugh A.
Kingsley C.
6-27-68
Kovacevic A.[6]
Quinn E.
7-624-67-65
Kozlov S.[2]
Damm M.
6-776-36-2
Montes De La Torre I.
Fanselow S.
3-66-16-4
Jubb P.
Escobedo E.
6-43-67-617
Svajda Z.
Walton A.
6-44-66-3