Aidan Mchugh vs Cannon Kingsley — Knoxville CH Round of 32

Knoxville CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
GBR
Aidan Mchugh
#489ATP
26 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWWLLWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 7 November 2022
hard
USA
Cannon Kingsley
#421ATP
1342ELO
1345Hard ELO
25 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLWLWWLW
Mchugh A.
6-2 7-6
Kingsley C.
Mchugh A.
67102
Kingsley C.
2680

Aidan Mchugh defeated Cannon Kingsley 6-2 7-6 in the Knoxville CH round of 32 on hard.

Key context

  • Match story: Aidan Mchugh closed it out in two sets, 6–2 7–6.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Mchugh A.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Kingsley C.

Kingsley C.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Mchugh A.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Mchugh A.Kingsley C.
1st serve in·Even
65%
63%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
67%
72%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
52%
Service points won·Even
62%
64%
Return points won·Even
37%
37%
Break points saved·Even
61%
62%
Aces / match·Clear edge
4.2
6.7
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.4
2.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (93 vs 110). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Mchugh A.Kingsley C.
Clutch Rating·Even
23
21
Break points saved·Even
72
74
Break points won·Clear edge
5
19
Deciding sets·Clear edge
49
27
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
11
20

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Mchugh A.
6.3
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Kingsley C.
5.7
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
10.0No prior meetings
H2H
0.0
4.5
Surface form
5.3
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
4.7
Minutes 14d
5.8
0.0
3-set count
4.0
4.0
Prev. match
4.0
Context
6.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Shelton B.[4]
Eubanks C.[3]
6-31-67-64
Semi-finals
Shelton B.[4]
Couacaud E.[7]
6-736-46-4
Eubanks C.[3]
Mmoh M.[1]
6-727-56-2
Quarter-finals
Eubanks C.[3]
Gerch L.
6-36-2
Couacaud E.[7]
Kozlov S.[2]
6-37-5
Shelton B.[4]
Kovacevic A.[6]
7-56-4
Mmoh M.[1]
Sandgren T.
6-36-4
R16
Gerch L.
Jubb P.
5-77-626-4
Mmoh M.[1]
Blanch U.
7-56-3
Kovacevic A.[6]
Montes De La Torre I.
6-16-4
Couacaud E.[7]
Mchugh A.
6-46-2
Eubanks C.[3]
Kirchheimer S.
7-626-4
Kozlov S.[2]
Gunneswaran P.
6-46-3
Shelton B.[4]
Krueger M.
6-26-1
Sandgren T.
Svajda Z.
6-16-2
R32
Blanch U.
Mccormick T.
6-33-67-5
Sandgren T.
Nava E.[5]
7-666-3
Eubanks C.[3]
Alvarez Varona N.
6-46-2
Gunneswaran P.
Bicknell B.
6-16-2
Blanch U.
Mccormick T.
6-33-67-5
Krueger M.
Hussey G.
7-616-1
Kirchheimer S.
Brymer G.
6-36-1
Shelton B.[4]
Smith K.
4-66-46-3
Mmoh M.[1]
Bernard A.
6-06-0
Gerch L.
Shang J.[8]
6-47-63
Couacaud E.[7]
Clark E.
7-656-3
Mchugh A.
Kingsley C.
6-27-68
Kovacevic A.[6]
Quinn E.
7-624-67-65
Kozlov S.[2]
Damm M.
6-776-36-2
Montes De La Torre I.
Fanselow S.
3-66-16-4
Jubb P.
Escobedo E.
6-43-67-617
Svajda Z.
Walton A.
6-44-66-3