Cannon Kingsley vs Luke Johnson — Knoxville CH Qualifying Round 1

Knoxville CH · CHALLENGER · Qualifying Round 1
USA4
Cannon Kingsley
#421ATP
1342ELO
1345Hard ELO
25 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLWLWWLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 7 November 2022
hard
GBR
Luke Johnson
32 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLLLLWLL
Kingsley C.
7-6 7-5
Johnson L.
Kingsley C.
7772
Johnson L.
6250

Cannon Kingsley defeated Luke Johnson 7-6 7-5 in the Knoxville CH qualifying round 1 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Kingsley C.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Johnson L.

Johnson L.serving79% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Kingsley C.

Serve advantage — Kingsley C.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Kingsley C.Johnson L.
1st serve in·Even
63%
61%
1st serve points won·Even
72%
68%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
48%
Service points won·Even
64%
60%
Return points won·Even
37%
37%
Break points saved·Slight edge
61%
53%
Aces / match·Clear edge
6.7
4.8
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.0
3.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (110 vs 8). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Kingsley C.
6.1
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Johnson L.
4.2
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 56 days (−0.7)
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
5.3
Surface form
1.8
0.0
Win streak
0.0Lost last 3
Fatigue & Travel
5.8
Minutes 14d
4.0
3-set count
4.0
Prev. match
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Q2
Mccormick T.[10]
Young D.[5]
3-66-47-5
Kirchheimer S.[1]
Maloney P.
7-636-4
Bernard A.
Arribage T.
7-646-3
Mccormick T.
Young D.
3-66-47-5
Montes De La Torre I.[11]
Bangoura S.[6]
6-46-4
Kingsley C.[4]
Pannu K.
6-13-66-4
Hussey G.[3]
Kypson P.[12]
6-36-2
Q1
Mccormick T.[10]
Chandrasekar A.
6-26-2
Montes De La Torre I.[11]
Leote Prata M.
6-26-2
Kirchheimer S.[1]
Wallart E.
6-21-0
Hussey G.[3]
Rogers A.
7-54-66-1
Bangoura S.[6]
Libietis M.
6-16-2
Arribage T.
Holmgren A.[2]
7-662-66-3
Kingsley C.[4]
Johnson L.
7-627-5
Kypson P.[12]
Smith R.
7-645-2
Pannu K.
Vale D.[8]
6-46-1
Mccormick T.
Chandrasekar A.
6-26-2
Young D.[5]
Adams H.
3-67-682-1
Bernard A.
Ponwith N.[7]
6-36-2
Maloney P.
Bertran P.[9]
6-26-3