Cem Ilkel vs Tim Van Rijthoven — Bratislava CH Quarter-final

Bratislava CH · CHALLENGER · Quarter-final
Cem Ilkel
TUR
Cem Ilkel
#1462ATP
30 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLLLLWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 7 November 2022
hard
NED5
Tim Van Rijthoven
29 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLLLL
Ilkel C.
6-4 7-5
Van Rijthoven T.
Ilkel C.
672
Van Rijthoven T.
450

Cem Ilkel defeated Tim Van Rijthoven 6-4 7-5 in the Bratislava CH quarter-final on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Ilkel C.serving88% hold

wins 68% of points on serve vs Van Rijthoven T.

Van Rijthoven T.serving91% hold

wins 71% of points on serve vs Ilkel C.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Ilkel C.Van Rijthoven T.
1st serve in·Slight edge
58%
66%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
72%
77%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
53%
Service points won·Slight edge
62%
69%
Return points won·Even
37%
33%
Break points saved·Slight edge
56%
65%
Aces / match·Dominant
4.9
11.0
Double faults / match·Even
2.5
2.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (123 vs 71). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Ilkel C.Van Rijthoven T.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
32
26
Break points saved·Dominant
49
90
Break points won·Even
3
1
Deciding sets·Dominant
70
19
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
66
61

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Ilkel C.
7.3
Strong advantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Van Rijthoven T.
5.8
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
10.0No prior meetings
H2H
0.0
8.0
Surface form
4.4
0.0
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
7.4
Minutes 14d
9.0
3-set count
7.0
9.0
Prev. match
8.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Shevchenko A.
Bonadio R.
6-37-5
Fucsovics M.[2]
Marozsan F.
6-26-4
Semi-finals
Bonadio R.
Tseng C.[2]
1-66-16-4
Shevchenko A.
Gombos N.[3]
7-657-64
Fucsovics M.[2]
Machac T.[4]
7-652-66-3
Marozsan F.
Ilkel C.
6-26-766-3
Quarter-finals
Tseng C.[2]
Kopriva V.[7]
7-55-77-5
Shevchenko A.
Kuznetsov A.
6-46-2
Gombos N.[3]
Kovalik J.
6-37-64
Bonadio R.
Krutykh O.
6-41-67-5
Fucsovics M.[2]
Marterer M.
6-46-1
Marozsan F.
Gombos N.[3]
6-13-66-3
Ilkel C.
Van Rijthoven T.[5]
6-47-5
Machac T.[4]
Klein L.
6-46-756-3
R16
Kopriva V.[7]
Nikles J.
6-16-4
Bonadio R.
Marozsan F.
7-55-76-2
Gombos N.[3]
Karlovskiy E.
6-07-5
Shevchenko A.
Novak D.[6]
6-36-2
Kuznetsov A.
Wessels L.
6-16-4
Krutykh O.
Svrcina D.
6-46-4
Kovalik J.
Popko D.[8]
6-736-06-1
Tseng C.[2]
Jianu F.
5-3
Fucsovics M.[2]
Hanfmann Y.
6-27-5
Marterer M.
Broady L.
4-67-636-2
Machac T.[4]
Travaglia S.
6-47-64
Klein L.
Kovalik J.[8]
7-656-3
Van Rijthoven T.[5]
Durasovic V.
6-747-646-4
Ilkel C.
Marchenko I.
4-67-56-3
Gombos N.[3]
Blancaneaux G.
6-27-64
Marozsan F.
Rodionov J.[6]
6-32-0
R32
Kovalik J.
Donskoy E.
6-756-26-2
Jianu F.
Marchenko I.
6-746-27-62
Svrcina D.
Martin A.[4]
6-36-4
Krutykh O.
Moro Canas A.
2-66-27-5
Popko D.[8]
Prihodko O.
4-66-16-2
Karlovskiy E.
Basic M.
6-36-3
Novak D.[6]
Moreno De Alboran N.
6-16-3
Shevchenko A.
Horansky F.
6-26-4
Wessels L.
Pucinelli De Almeida M.
6-706-47-65
Tseng C.[2]
Rosol L.
6-46-4
Marozsan F.
Klein L.
6-46-4
Bonadio R.
Kolar Z.[5]
6-26-2
Gombos N.[3]
Privara P.
6-13-66-4
Nikles J.
Sachko V.
3-66-36-4
Kopriva V.[7]
Dutra Da Silva D.
7-677-64
Kuznetsov A.
Karol M.
7-637-63
Ilkel C.
Bergs Z.
6-736-46-1
Kovalik J.[8]
Kopriva V.
7-657-63
Hanfmann Y.
Mensik J.
6-36-4
Marchenko I.
Zhang Z.[1]
7-677-5
Broady L.
Cobolli F.
7-646-0
Marozsan F.
Struff J.
7-653-66-2
Fucsovics M.[2]
Pokorny L.
7-636-0
Durasovic V.
Privara P.
6-36-4
Blancaneaux G.
Piros Z.
6-26-0
Machac T.[4]
Peniston R.
6-47-5
Travaglia S.
Celikbilek A.
7-636-1
Klein L.
Medjedovic H.
6-36-2
Rodionov J.[6]
Rosol L.
6-36-746-2
Gombos N.[3]
Squire H.
6-46-3
Van Rijthoven T.[5]
Shevchenko A.
6-26-4
Marterer M.
Sels J.[7]
7-696-2