Cem Ilkel vs Denis Istomin — Bratislava CH Qualifying Round 1

Bratislava CH · CHALLENGER · Qualifying Round 1
Cem Ilkel
TUR8
Cem Ilkel
#1462ATP
30 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLLLLWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 7 November 2022
hard
UZB
Denis Istomin
39 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWWWLLLL
Ilkel C.
7-6 7-5
Istomin D.
Ilkel C.
7772
Istomin D.
6250

Cem Ilkel defeated Denis Istomin 7-6 7-5 in the Bratislava CH qualifying round 1 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Ilkel C.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Istomin D.

Istomin D.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Ilkel C.

Serve advantage — Ilkel C.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Ilkel C.Istomin D.
1st serve in·Slight edge
58%
66%
1st serve points won·Even
72%
68%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
46%
Service points won·Even
62%
61%
Return points won·Even
37%
35%
Break points saved·Even
56%
59%
Aces / match·Even
5.0
5.0
Double faults / match·Even
2.5
2.7

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (123 vs 41). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Ilkel C.Istomin D.
Clutch Rating·Even
32
29
Break points saved·Dominant
49
90
Break points won·Even
3
5
Deciding sets·Dominant
70
44
Tiebreaks·Dominant
66
18

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Ilkel C.
6.9
Slight advantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Istomin D.
5.6
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
8.0
Surface form
2.5
0.0
Win streak
0.0Lost last 3
Fatigue & Travel
7.4
Minutes 14d
9.3
9.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Q2
Moro Canas A.[12]
Medjedovic H.
W/O
Krutykh O.[4]
Gautier A.[10]
2-66-36-4
Marozsan F.[8]
Wessels L.[6]
6-36-4
Prihodko O.[11]
Jianu F.[3]
6-26-6
Nikles J.[2]
Mridha J.
6-24-66-2
Karlovskiy E.[1]
Ionel N.[9]
6-36-1
Travaglia S.[7]
Paulson A.
6-46-737-65
Ilkel C.[8]
Sachko V.[3]
6-33-66-3
Marchenko I.
Friberg K.
6-26-3
Medjedovic H.[2]
Horansky F.[9]
6-756-46-4
Durasovic V.[10]
Krumich M.
6-36-2
Squire H.[12]
Krutykh O.[1]
6-47-64
Q1
Prihodko O.[11]
Pokorny L.
7-56-4
Wessels L.[6]
Fomin S.
6-36-2
Marozsan F.[8]
Palovic L.
6-36-0
Nikles J.[2]
Madarasz G.
6-47-63
Gautier A.[10]
Safranek V.
6-46-2
Mridha J.
Krstin P.[7]
4-67-654-2
Ionel N.[9]
Krajcik A.
6-16-4
Moro Canas A.[12]
Neumayer L.
4-66-16-4
Medjedovic H.
Tu L.[5]
6-36-4
Krutykh O.[4]
Nad P.
3-66-26-4
Jianu F.[3]
Peliwo F.
6-746-26-4
Karlovskiy E.[1]
Perchicot M.
6-36-2
Medjedovic H.[2]
Kumstat J.
6-16-4
Durasovic V.[10]
Karol M.
6-46-3
Sachko V.[3]
Nad P.
6-26-4
Horansky F.[9]
Molleker R.
6-16-2
Krumich M.
Collignon R.[4]
3-67-656-1
Krutykh O.[1]
Rosenkranz M.
6-46-4
Paulson A.
Karlovskiy E.[6]
6-36-2
Marchenko I.
Ajdukovic D.[11]
6-26-2
Friberg K.
Hassan B.[5]
7-636-1
Ilkel C.[8]
Istomin D.
7-627-5
Squire H.[12]
Setkic A.
6-746-27-65