Mitchell Krueger vs Giles Hussey — Knoxville CH Round of 32

Knoxville CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Mitchell Krueger
USA
Mitchell Krueger
#364ATP
1461ELO
1436Hard ELO
32 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WLLLLLLLLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 7 November 2022
hard
GBR
Giles Hussey
#258ATP
1584ELO
1517Hard ELO
29 yrs · 185 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWWLWLWW
Krueger M.
7-6 6-1
Hussey G.
Krueger M.
7762
Hussey G.
6110

Mitchell Krueger defeated Giles Hussey 7-6 6-1 in the Knoxville CH round of 32 on hard.

Key context

  • Match story: Mitchell Krueger came through a tight passage before pulling clear — 7–6 6–1.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Krueger M.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Hussey G.

Hussey G.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Krueger M.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Krueger M.Hussey G.
1st serve in·Even
64%
62%
1st serve points won·Even
69%
67%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
52%
Service points won·Even
63%
61%
Return points won·Even
38%
40%
Break points saved·Even
60%
59%
Aces / match·Slight edge
4.5
3.5
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.0
2.6

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 97). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Krueger M.Hussey G.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
16
45
Break points saved·Dominant
87
57
Break points won·Dominant
14
57
Deciding sets·Dominant
13
78
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
0
13

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Krueger M.
6.3
Marginal edgeUmpiry Score
Hussey G.
3.7
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 154 days (−1.5)
Form & Matchup
6.4Hard Elo 1436
Surface ELO
3.6+82 Hard Elo edge
6.4Overall Elo 1461
ELO gap
3.6Overall Elo 1584
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
4.0
Surface form
0.0Lost last 2
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
6.3
Minutes 14d
7.0
3-set count
6.0
Prev. match
Surface transition
7.0
Context
6.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Krueger M.Hussey G.
Freshness·Clear edge
87
99

Krueger M.: 1 day rest · 1 match, 20 games (7d) · Hussey G.: 14 days rest · 1 match (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Shelton B.[4]
Eubanks C.[3]
6-31-67-64
Semi-finals
Shelton B.[4]
Couacaud E.[7]
6-736-46-4
Eubanks C.[3]
Mmoh M.[1]
6-727-56-2
Quarter-finals
Eubanks C.[3]
Gerch L.
6-36-2
Couacaud E.[7]
Kozlov S.[2]
6-37-5
Shelton B.[4]
Kovacevic A.[6]
7-56-4
Mmoh M.[1]
Sandgren T.
6-36-4
R16
Gerch L.
Jubb P.
5-77-626-4
Mmoh M.[1]
Blanch U.
7-56-3
Kovacevic A.[6]
Montes De La Torre I.
6-16-4
Couacaud E.[7]
Mchugh A.
6-46-2
Eubanks C.[3]
Kirchheimer S.
7-626-4
Kozlov S.[2]
Gunneswaran P.
6-46-3
Shelton B.[4]
Krueger M.
6-26-1
Sandgren T.
Svajda Z.
6-16-2
R32
Blanch U.
Mccormick T.
6-33-67-5
Sandgren T.
Nava E.[5]
7-666-3
Eubanks C.[3]
Alvarez Varona N.
6-46-2
Gunneswaran P.
Bicknell B.
6-16-2
Blanch U.
Mccormick T.
6-33-67-5
Krueger M.
Hussey G.
7-616-1
Kirchheimer S.
Brymer G.
6-36-1
Shelton B.[4]
Smith K.
4-66-46-3
Mmoh M.[1]
Bernard A.
6-06-0
Gerch L.
Shang J.[8]
6-47-63
Couacaud E.[7]
Clark E.
7-656-3
Mchugh A.
Kingsley C.
6-27-68
Kovacevic A.[6]
Quinn E.
7-624-67-65
Kozlov S.[2]
Damm M.
6-776-36-2
Montes De La Torre I.
Fanselow S.
3-66-16-4
Jubb P.
Escobedo E.
6-43-67-617
Svajda Z.
Walton A.
6-44-66-3