Fabian Marozsan vs Norbert Gombos — Bratislava CH Quarter-final

Bratislava CH · CHALLENGER · Quarter-final
Fabian Marozsan
HUN
Fabian Marozsan
#54ATP
1784ELO
1747Hard ELO
$728kYTD
$4.6MCAREER
26 yrs · 193 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWWLWLL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 7 November 2022
hard
Norbert Gombos
SVK3
Norbert Gombos
#370ATP
1472ELO
1452Hard ELO
35 yrs · 193 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLWWLWL
Marozsan F.
6-1 3-6 6-3
Gombos N.
Marozsan F.
6362
Gombos N.
1631

Fabian Marozsan defeated Norbert Gombos 6-1 3-6 6-3 in the Bratislava CH quarter-final on hard. The result followed the form book — Fabian Marozsan came in ranked #54.

Key context

  • Match story: Fabian Marozsan closed it out in three sets, 6–1 3–6 6–3.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Marozsan F.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Gombos N.

Gombos N.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Marozsan F.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Marozsan F.Gombos N.
31
Serve
—
45
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Marozsan F.Gombos N.
1st serve in·Slight edge
65%
60%
1st serve points won·Even
70%
72%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
51%
Service points won·Even
64%
63%
Return points won·Even
37%
38%
Break points saved·Even
61%
59%
Aces / match·Even
4.4
4.9
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.2
2.6

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 199). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Marozsan F.Gombos N.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
71
41
Break points saved·Clear edge
97
83
Break points won·Dominant
36
8
Deciding sets·Slight edge
81
70
Tiebreaks·Dominant
95
36

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Marozsan F.
6.9
Slight advantageUmpiry Score
Gombos N.
4.1
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
  • Extended break: 35 days (−0.7)
Form & Matchup
8.7+294 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
1.3Hard Elo 1452
8.9Overall Elo 1784
ELO gap
1.1Overall Elo 1472
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
5.3
Surface form
7.0
0.0Lost last 2
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
9.2
Minutes 14d
7.0
3-set count
9.0
Prev. match
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Marozsan F.Gombos N.
Freshness·Clear edge
98
79

Marozsan F.: 13 days rest · 1 match (14d) · Gombos N.: 3 days rest · 2 matches, 39 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Shevchenko A.
Bonadio R.
6-37-5
Fucsovics M.[2]
Marozsan F.
6-26-4
Semi-finals
Bonadio R.
Tseng C.[2]
1-66-16-4
Shevchenko A.
Gombos N.[3]
7-657-64
Fucsovics M.[2]
Machac T.[4]
7-652-66-3
Marozsan F.
Ilkel C.
6-26-766-3
Quarter-finals
Tseng C.[2]
Kopriva V.[7]
7-55-77-5
Shevchenko A.
Kuznetsov A.
6-46-2
Gombos N.[3]
Kovalik J.
6-37-64
Bonadio R.
Krutykh O.
6-41-67-5
Fucsovics M.[2]
Marterer M.
6-46-1
Marozsan F.
Gombos N.[3]
6-13-66-3
Ilkel C.
Van Rijthoven T.[5]
6-47-5
Machac T.[4]
Klein L.
6-46-756-3
R16
Kopriva V.[7]
Nikles J.
6-16-4
Bonadio R.
Marozsan F.
7-55-76-2
Gombos N.[3]
Karlovskiy E.
6-07-5
Shevchenko A.
Novak D.[6]
6-36-2
Kuznetsov A.
Wessels L.
6-16-4
Krutykh O.
Svrcina D.
6-46-4
Kovalik J.
Popko D.[8]
6-736-06-1
Tseng C.[2]
Jianu F.
5-3
Fucsovics M.[2]
Hanfmann Y.
6-27-5
Marterer M.
Broady L.
4-67-636-2
Machac T.[4]
Travaglia S.
6-47-64
Klein L.
Kovalik J.[8]
7-656-3
Van Rijthoven T.[5]
Durasovic V.
6-747-646-4
Ilkel C.
Marchenko I.
4-67-56-3
Gombos N.[3]
Blancaneaux G.
6-27-64
Marozsan F.
Rodionov J.[6]
6-32-0
R32
Kovalik J.
Donskoy E.
6-756-26-2
Jianu F.
Marchenko I.
6-746-27-62
Svrcina D.
Martin A.[4]
6-36-4
Krutykh O.
Moro Canas A.
2-66-27-5
Popko D.[8]
Prihodko O.
4-66-16-2
Karlovskiy E.
Basic M.
6-36-3
Novak D.[6]
Moreno De Alboran N.
6-16-3
Shevchenko A.
Horansky F.
6-26-4
Wessels L.
Pucinelli De Almeida M.
6-706-47-65
Tseng C.[2]
Rosol L.
6-46-4
Marozsan F.
Klein L.
6-46-4
Bonadio R.
Kolar Z.[5]
6-26-2
Gombos N.[3]
Privara P.
6-13-66-4
Nikles J.
Sachko V.
3-66-36-4
Kopriva V.[7]
Dutra Da Silva D.
7-677-64
Kuznetsov A.
Karol M.
7-637-63
Ilkel C.
Bergs Z.
6-736-46-1
Kovalik J.[8]
Kopriva V.
7-657-63
Hanfmann Y.
Mensik J.
6-36-4
Marchenko I.
Zhang Z.[1]
7-677-5
Broady L.
Cobolli F.
7-646-0
Marozsan F.
Struff J.
7-653-66-2
Fucsovics M.[2]
Pokorny L.
7-636-0
Durasovic V.
Privara P.
6-36-4
Blancaneaux G.
Piros Z.
6-26-0
Machac T.[4]
Peniston R.
6-47-5
Travaglia S.
Celikbilek A.
7-636-1
Klein L.
Medjedovic H.
6-36-2
Rodionov J.[6]
Rosol L.
6-36-746-2
Gombos N.[3]
Squire H.
6-46-3
Van Rijthoven T.[5]
Shevchenko A.
6-26-4
Marterer M.
Sels J.[7]
7-696-2