Christopher Eubanks vs Lucas Gerch — Knoxville CH Quarter-final

Knoxville CH · CHALLENGER · Quarter-final
USA3
Christopher Eubanks
#788ATP
1523ELO
1493Hard ELO
30 yrs · 201 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWWLWLLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 7 November 2022
hard
GER
Lucas Gerch
#941ATP
31 yrs · 193 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLWWWWW
Eubanks C.
6-3 6-2
Gerch L.
Eubanks C.
662
Gerch L.
320

Christopher Eubanks defeated Lucas Gerch 6-3 6-2 in the Knoxville CH quarter-final on hard. The result followed the form book — Christopher Eubanks came in ranked #788, defending the title.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Eubanks C.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Gerch L.

Gerch L.serving87% hold

wins 67% of points on serve vs Eubanks C.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Eubanks C.Gerch L.
1st serve in·Slight edge
68%
58%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
74%
69%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
48%
Service points won·Slight edge
67%
61%
Return points won·Slight edge
33%
41%
Break points saved·Slight edge
64%
56%
Aces / match·Dominant
10.4
3.6
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.2
4.4

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 107). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Eubanks C.Gerch L.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
50
0
Break points saved·Dominant
96
27
Break points won·Slight edge
3
11
Deciding sets·Dominant
67
19
Tiebreaks·Dominant
74
32

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Eubanks C.
6.9
Slight advantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Gerch L.
6.3
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
7.1
Surface form
6.6
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
4.5
Minutes 14d
7.2
4.0
3-set count
8.0
Prev. match
7.0
Context
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Shelton B.[4]
Eubanks C.[3]
6-31-67-64
Semi-finals
Shelton B.[4]
Couacaud E.[7]
6-736-46-4
Eubanks C.[3]
Mmoh M.[1]
6-727-56-2
Quarter-finals
Eubanks C.[3]
Gerch L.
6-36-2
Couacaud E.[7]
Kozlov S.[2]
6-37-5
Shelton B.[4]
Kovacevic A.[6]
7-56-4
Mmoh M.[1]
Sandgren T.
6-36-4
R16
Gerch L.
Jubb P.
5-77-626-4
Mmoh M.[1]
Blanch U.
7-56-3
Kovacevic A.[6]
Montes De La Torre I.
6-16-4
Couacaud E.[7]
Mchugh A.
6-46-2
Eubanks C.[3]
Kirchheimer S.
7-626-4
Kozlov S.[2]
Gunneswaran P.
6-46-3
Shelton B.[4]
Krueger M.
6-26-1
Sandgren T.
Svajda Z.
6-16-2
R32
Blanch U.
Mccormick T.
6-33-67-5
Sandgren T.
Nava E.[5]
7-666-3
Eubanks C.[3]
Alvarez Varona N.
6-46-2
Gunneswaran P.
Bicknell B.
6-16-2
Blanch U.
Mccormick T.
6-33-67-5
Krueger M.
Hussey G.
7-616-1
Kirchheimer S.
Brymer G.
6-36-1
Shelton B.[4]
Smith K.
4-66-46-3
Mmoh M.[1]
Bernard A.
6-06-0
Gerch L.
Shang J.[8]
6-47-63
Couacaud E.[7]
Clark E.
7-656-3
Mchugh A.
Kingsley C.
6-27-68
Kovacevic A.[6]
Quinn E.
7-624-67-65
Kozlov S.[2]
Damm M.
6-776-36-2
Montes De La Torre I.
Fanselow S.
3-66-16-4
Jubb P.
Escobedo E.
6-43-67-617
Svajda Z.
Walton A.
6-44-66-3