Enzo Couacaud vs Aidan Mchugh — Knoxville CH Round of 16

Knoxville CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
FRA7
Enzo Couacaud
31 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWLWLLLWWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 7 November 2022
hard
GBR
Aidan Mchugh
#489ATP
26 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWWLLWL
Couacaud E.
6-4 6-2
Mchugh A.
Couacaud E.
662
Mchugh A.
420

Enzo Couacaud defeated Aidan Mchugh 6-4 6-2 in the Knoxville CH round of 16 on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Aidan Mchugh came in defending last year's quarter-final.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Couacaud E.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Mchugh A.

Mchugh A.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Couacaud E.

Serve advantage — Couacaud E.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Couacaud E.Mchugh A.
1st serve in·Slight edge
56%
65%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
73%
67%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
52%
Service points won·Even
63%
62%
Return points won·Even
39%
37%
Break points saved·Even
60%
62%
Aces / match·Clear edge
6.6
4.2
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.2
2.4

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (184 vs 93). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Couacaud E.Mchugh A.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
47
23
Break points saved·Slight edge
79
72
Break points won·Clear edge
29
5
Deciding sets·Dominant
77
49
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
29
11

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Couacaud E.
6.4
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Mchugh A.
5.7
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
10.0No prior meetings
H2H
0.0
4.0
Surface form
4.5
0.0Lost last 2
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
8.2
Minutes 14d
4.7
3-set count
0.0
8.0
Prev. match
4.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Shelton B.[4]
Eubanks C.[3]
6-31-67-64
Semi-finals
Shelton B.[4]
Couacaud E.[7]
6-736-46-4
Eubanks C.[3]
Mmoh M.[1]
6-727-56-2
Quarter-finals
Eubanks C.[3]
Gerch L.
6-36-2
Couacaud E.[7]
Kozlov S.[2]
6-37-5
Shelton B.[4]
Kovacevic A.[6]
7-56-4
Mmoh M.[1]
Sandgren T.
6-36-4
R16
Gerch L.
Jubb P.
5-77-626-4
Mmoh M.[1]
Blanch U.
7-56-3
Kovacevic A.[6]
Montes De La Torre I.
6-16-4
Couacaud E.[7]
Mchugh A.
6-46-2
Eubanks C.[3]
Kirchheimer S.
7-626-4
Kozlov S.[2]
Gunneswaran P.
6-46-3
Shelton B.[4]
Krueger M.
6-26-1
Sandgren T.
Svajda Z.
6-16-2
R32
Blanch U.
Mccormick T.
6-33-67-5
Sandgren T.
Nava E.[5]
7-666-3
Eubanks C.[3]
Alvarez Varona N.
6-46-2
Gunneswaran P.
Bicknell B.
6-16-2
Blanch U.
Mccormick T.
6-33-67-5
Krueger M.
Hussey G.
7-616-1
Kirchheimer S.
Brymer G.
6-36-1
Shelton B.[4]
Smith K.
4-66-46-3
Mmoh M.[1]
Bernard A.
6-06-0
Gerch L.
Shang J.[8]
6-47-63
Couacaud E.[7]
Clark E.
7-656-3
Mchugh A.
Kingsley C.
6-27-68
Kovacevic A.[6]
Quinn E.
7-624-67-65
Kozlov S.[2]
Damm M.
6-776-36-2
Montes De La Torre I.
Fanselow S.
3-66-16-4
Jubb P.
Escobedo E.
6-43-67-617
Svajda Z.
Walton A.
6-44-66-3