Moez Echargui vs Francisco Comesana — Montevideo CH Round of 32

Montevideo CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Moez Echargui
TUN
Moez Echargui
#151ATP
1416ELO
1342Clay ELO
$171kYTD
$469kCAREER
33 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLLLLLLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 7 November 2022
clay
Francisco Comesana
ARG
Francisco Comesana
#94ATP
1695ELO
1656Clay ELO
$580kYTD
$2.5MCAREER
25 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLLWWLWW
Echargui M.
6-1 6-1
Comesana F.
Echargui M.
662
Comesana F.
110

Moez Echargui defeated Francisco Comesana 6-1 6-1 in the Montevideo CH round of 32 on clay. The upset overturned the form book — Francisco Comesana came in ranked #94, defending last year's round of 16.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Echargui M.serving66% hold

wins 56% of points on serve vs Comesana F.

Comesana F.serving70% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Echargui M.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on clay

Echargui M.Comesana F.
—
Serve
40
—
Return
16

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the clay field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Echargui M.Comesana F.
1st serve in·Slight edge
58%
64%
1st serve points won·Even
67%
71%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
50%
Service points won·Even
59%
63%
Return points won·Even
41%
39%
Break points saved·Even
57%
59%
Aces / match·Clear edge
3.4
5.8
Double faults / match·Slight edge
3.0
2.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (184 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Echargui M.Comesana F.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
4
56
Break points saved·Dominant
48
90
Break points won·Dominant
11
36
Deciding sets·Dominant
4
79
Tiebreaks·Even
42
38

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Echargui M.
3.9
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
  • Extended break: 35 days (−0.7)
Comesana F.
6.1
Even matchUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
2.6Clay Elo 1342
Surface ELO
7.4+314 Clay Elo edge
3.1Overall Elo 1416
ELO gap
6.9Overall Elo 1695
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
3.1
Surface form
2.0
0.0
Win streak
0.0Lost last 7
Fatigue & Travel
Minutes 14d
8.0
Prev. match
7.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Echargui M.Comesana F.
Freshness·Slight edge
100
90

Echargui M.: 19 days rest · Comesana F.: 11 days rest · 3 matches (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Olivieri G.
Etcheverry T.[2]
6-737-656-3
Semi-finals
Olivieri G.
Agamenone F.[8]
2-66-46-4
Etcheverry T.[2]
Altmaier D.[3]
6-756-37-66
Quarter-finals
Olivieri G.
Trungelliti M.
6-16-4
Altmaier D.[3]
Kicker N.
6-41-66-3
Etcheverry T.[2]
Diaz Acosta F.
7-56-4
Agamenone F.[8]
Bagnis F.[4]
3-66-16-2
R16
Diaz Acosta F.
Cerundolo J.[7]
6-33-0
Etcheverry T.[2]
Navone M.
6-46-1
Altmaier D.[3]
Meligeni Alves F.
7-656-3
Kicker N.
Pucinelli De Almeida M.
4-66-36-3
Bagnis F.[4]
Paz J.
6-756-16-0
Olivieri G.
Elias G.
7-56-3
Trungelliti M.
Houkes M.
7-666-2
Agamenone F.[8]
Echargui M.
7-56-3
R32
Diaz Acosta F.
Casanova H.
6-34-1
Paz J.
Villanueva G.
6-47-69
Altmaier D.[3]
Torres J.
6-26-2
Kicker N.
Ugo Carabelli C.[6]
6-46-4
Agamenone F.[8]
Collarini A.
6-47-5
Trungelliti M.
Cecchinato M.[5]
6-46-4
Olivieri G.
Choinski J.
7-57-5
Houkes M.
Roncadelli F.
7-56-2
Etcheverry T.[2]
Milojevic N.
6-36-2
Bagnis F.[4]
Zeballos F.
7-656-3
Elias G.
Ribeiro E.
5-76-06-2
Navone M.
Borg L.
7-56-1
Pucinelli De Almeida M.
Rodriguez Taverna S.
7-656-3
Meligeni Alves F.
Nagal S.
6-46-3
Cerundolo J.[7]
Pella G.
7-56-3
Echargui M.
Comesana F.
6-16-1