Michael Mmoh vs Ulises Blanch — Knoxville CH Round of 16

Knoxville CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
Michael Mmoh
USA1
Michael Mmoh
#188ATP
1613ELO
1599Hard ELO
$85kYTD
$2.4MCAREER
28 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLLLWWWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 7 November 2022
hard
USA
Ulises Blanch
#1661ATP
28 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLLWWWW
Mmoh M.
7-5 6-3
Blanch U.
Mmoh M.
762
Blanch U.
530

Michael Mmoh defeated Ulises Blanch 7-5 6-3 in the Knoxville CH round of 16 on hard. The result followed the form book — Michael Mmoh came in ranked #188, defending last year's semi-final.

Key context

  • Match story: Michael Mmoh closed it out in two sets, 7–5 6–3.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Mmoh M.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Blanch U.

Blanch U.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Mmoh M.

Serve advantage — Mmoh M.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Mmoh M.Blanch U.
1st serve in·Slight edge
65%
58%
1st serve points won·Even
71%
74%
2nd serve points won·Even
47%
49%
Service points won·Even
63%
63%
Return points won·Even
39%
36%
Break points saved·Even
62%
63%
Aces / match·Even
6.0
6.3
Double faults / match·Even
3.8
3.8

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (199 vs 113). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Mmoh M.Blanch U.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
66
19
Break points saved·Slight edge
91
83
Break points won·Dominant
31
2
Deciding sets·Dominant
90
19
Tiebreaks·Dominant
77
37

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Mmoh M.
7.0
Strong advantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Blanch U.
4.8
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Recent retirement (−1.5)
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
8.0
Surface form
5.6
0.0
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
7.6
Minutes 14d
5.8
3-set count
7.0
7.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
8.5
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Mmoh M.Blanch U.
Freshness·
95
—

Mmoh M.: 13 days rest · 2 matches (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Shelton B.[4]
Eubanks C.[3]
6-31-67-64
Semi-finals
Shelton B.[4]
Couacaud E.[7]
6-736-46-4
Eubanks C.[3]
Mmoh M.[1]
6-727-56-2
Quarter-finals
Eubanks C.[3]
Gerch L.
6-36-2
Couacaud E.[7]
Kozlov S.[2]
6-37-5
Shelton B.[4]
Kovacevic A.[6]
7-56-4
Mmoh M.[1]
Sandgren T.
6-36-4
R16
Gerch L.
Jubb P.
5-77-626-4
Mmoh M.[1]
Blanch U.
7-56-3
Kovacevic A.[6]
Montes De La Torre I.
6-16-4
Couacaud E.[7]
Mchugh A.
6-46-2
Eubanks C.[3]
Kirchheimer S.
7-626-4
Kozlov S.[2]
Gunneswaran P.
6-46-3
Shelton B.[4]
Krueger M.
6-26-1
Sandgren T.
Svajda Z.
6-16-2
R32
Blanch U.
Mccormick T.
6-33-67-5
Sandgren T.
Nava E.[5]
7-666-3
Eubanks C.[3]
Alvarez Varona N.
6-46-2
Gunneswaran P.
Bicknell B.
6-16-2
Blanch U.
Mccormick T.
6-33-67-5
Krueger M.
Hussey G.
7-616-1
Kirchheimer S.
Brymer G.
6-36-1
Shelton B.[4]
Smith K.
4-66-46-3
Mmoh M.[1]
Bernard A.
6-06-0
Gerch L.
Shang J.[8]
6-47-63
Couacaud E.[7]
Clark E.
7-656-3
Mchugh A.
Kingsley C.
6-27-68
Kovacevic A.[6]
Quinn E.
7-624-67-65
Kozlov S.[2]
Damm M.
6-776-36-2
Montes De La Torre I.
Fanselow S.
3-66-16-4
Jubb P.
Escobedo E.
6-43-67-617
Svajda Z.
Walton A.
6-44-66-3