Facundo Bagnis vs Juan Pablo Paz — Montevideo CH Round of 16

Montevideo CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
ARG4
Facundo Bagnis
#431ATP
1591ELO
1584Clay ELO
36 yrs · 183 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWLWWWL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 7 November 2022
clay
ARG
Juan Pablo Paz
#1785ATP
31 yrs · 173 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLWWWLLW
Bagnis F.
6-7 6-1 6-0
Paz J.
Bagnis F.
65662
Paz J.
77101

Facundo Bagnis defeated Juan Pablo Paz 6-7 6-1 6-0 in the Montevideo CH round of 16 on clay. The result followed the form book — Facundo Bagnis came in ranked #431, defending last year's quarter-final.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Bagnis F.serving72% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Paz J.

Paz J.serving68% hold

wins 57% of points on serve vs Bagnis F.

Serve advantage — Bagnis F.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Bagnis F.Paz J.
1st serve in·Even
63%
60%
1st serve points won·Even
69%
67%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
49%
Service points won·Even
62%
60%
Return points won·Even
39%
39%
Break points saved·Even
62%
58%
Aces / match·Clear edge
4.6
3.0
Double faults / match·Even
2.7
2.6

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (198 vs 64). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Bagnis F.Paz J.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
54
0
Break points saved·Dominant
92
32
Break points won·Slight edge
35
24
Deciding sets·Dominant
89
11
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
3
9

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Bagnis F.
7.3
Strong advantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Paz J.
6.2
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
9.3
Surface form
5.1
9.05-match win streak
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
8.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
7.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Olivieri G.
Etcheverry T.[2]
6-737-656-3
Semi-finals
Olivieri G.
Agamenone F.[8]
2-66-46-4
Etcheverry T.[2]
Altmaier D.[3]
6-756-37-66
Quarter-finals
Olivieri G.
Trungelliti M.
6-16-4
Altmaier D.[3]
Kicker N.
6-41-66-3
Etcheverry T.[2]
Diaz Acosta F.
7-56-4
Agamenone F.[8]
Bagnis F.[4]
3-66-16-2
R16
Diaz Acosta F.
Cerundolo J.[7]
6-33-0
Etcheverry T.[2]
Navone M.
6-46-1
Altmaier D.[3]
Meligeni Alves F.
7-656-3
Kicker N.
Pucinelli De Almeida M.
4-66-36-3
Bagnis F.[4]
Paz J.
6-756-16-0
Olivieri G.
Elias G.
7-56-3
Trungelliti M.
Houkes M.
7-666-2
Agamenone F.[8]
Echargui M.
7-56-3
R32
Diaz Acosta F.
Casanova H.
6-34-1
Paz J.
Villanueva G.
6-47-69
Altmaier D.[3]
Torres J.
6-26-2
Kicker N.
Ugo Carabelli C.[6]
6-46-4
Agamenone F.[8]
Collarini A.
6-47-5
Trungelliti M.
Cecchinato M.[5]
6-46-4
Olivieri G.
Choinski J.
7-57-5
Houkes M.
Roncadelli F.
7-56-2
Etcheverry T.[2]
Milojevic N.
6-36-2
Bagnis F.[4]
Zeballos F.
7-656-3
Elias G.
Ribeiro E.
5-76-06-2
Navone M.
Borg L.
7-56-1
Pucinelli De Almeida M.
Rodriguez Taverna S.
7-656-3
Meligeni Alves F.
Nagal S.
6-46-3
Cerundolo J.[7]
Pella G.
7-56-3
Echargui M.
Comesana F.
6-16-1