Facundo Diaz Acosta vs Hernan Casanova — Montevideo CH Round of 32

Montevideo CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Facundo Diaz Acosta
ARG
Facundo Diaz Acosta
#110ATP
1681ELO
1668Clay ELO
$264kYTD
$1.7MCAREER
25 yrs · 183 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWWWWWL
0 — 0
Sets
Retired
Monday, 7 November 2022
clay
Hernan Casanova
ARG
Hernan Casanova
#337ATP
1393ELO
1381Clay ELO
32 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLWWWWLW
Diaz Acosta F.
6-3 4-1
Casanova H.
Diaz Acosta F.
64–
Casanova H.
31–

Facundo Diaz Acosta advanced when Hernan Casanova retired 6-3 4-1 in the Montevideo CH round of 32.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Diaz Acosta F.serving63% hold

wins 55% of points on serve vs Casanova H.

Casanova H.serving56% hold

wins 53% of points on serve vs Diaz Acosta F.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Diaz Acosta F.Casanova H.
1st serve in·Clear edge
63%
76%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
68%
60%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
49%
Service points won·Slight edge
62%
57%
Return points won·Even
41%
43%
Break points saved·Even
61%
57%
Aces / match·Clear edge
2.7
0.5
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.8
1.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 155). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Diaz Acosta F.Casanova H.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
58
8
Break points saved·Dominant
89
24
Break points won·Slight edge
33
22
Deciding sets·Dominant
67
32
Tiebreaks·Dominant
81
34

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Diaz Acosta F.
7.2
Strong advantageUmpiry Score
Casanova H.
5.2
Clear underdogUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
7.5+287 Clay Elo edge
Surface ELO
2.5Clay Elo 1381
7.3Overall Elo 1681
ELO gap
2.7Overall Elo 1393
7.2No prior meetings
H2H
2.8
5.8
Surface form
4.1
0.0
Win streak
0.0Lost last 3
Fatigue & Travel
7.5
Minutes 14d
7.9
7.0
3-set count
7.0
8.0
Prev. match
7.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Diaz Acosta F.Casanova H.
Freshness·Clear edge
53
70

Diaz Acosta F.: 3 days rest · 4 matches, 100 games (7d) · Casanova H.: 4 days rest · 3 matches, 62 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Olivieri G.
Etcheverry T.[2]
6-737-656-3
Semi-finals
Olivieri G.
Agamenone F.[8]
2-66-46-4
Etcheverry T.[2]
Altmaier D.[3]
6-756-37-66
Quarter-finals
Olivieri G.
Trungelliti M.
6-16-4
Altmaier D.[3]
Kicker N.
6-41-66-3
Etcheverry T.[2]
Diaz Acosta F.
7-56-4
Agamenone F.[8]
Bagnis F.[4]
3-66-16-2
R16
Diaz Acosta F.
Cerundolo J.[7]
6-33-0
Etcheverry T.[2]
Navone M.
6-46-1
Altmaier D.[3]
Meligeni Alves F.
7-656-3
Kicker N.
Pucinelli De Almeida M.
4-66-36-3
Bagnis F.[4]
Paz J.
6-756-16-0
Olivieri G.
Elias G.
7-56-3
Trungelliti M.
Houkes M.
7-666-2
Agamenone F.[8]
Echargui M.
7-56-3
R32
Diaz Acosta F.
Casanova H.
6-34-1
Paz J.
Villanueva G.
6-47-69
Altmaier D.[3]
Torres J.
6-26-2
Kicker N.
Ugo Carabelli C.[6]
6-46-4
Agamenone F.[8]
Collarini A.
6-47-5
Trungelliti M.
Cecchinato M.[5]
6-46-4
Olivieri G.
Choinski J.
7-57-5
Houkes M.
Roncadelli F.
7-56-2
Etcheverry T.[2]
Milojevic N.
6-36-2
Bagnis F.[4]
Zeballos F.
7-656-3
Elias G.
Ribeiro E.
5-76-06-2
Navone M.
Borg L.
7-56-1
Pucinelli De Almeida M.
Rodriguez Taverna S.
7-656-3
Meligeni Alves F.
Nagal S.
6-46-3
Cerundolo J.[7]
Pella G.
7-56-3
Echargui M.
Comesana F.
6-16-1