Max Purcell vs Kyle Seelig — Sydney CH Round of 16

Sydney CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
AUS8
Max Purcell
28 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLLLLWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 31 October 2022
hard
USA
Kyle Seelig
#2142ATP
28 yrs · 175 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLWLLLW
Purcell M.
6-3 6-2
Seelig K.
Purcell M.
662
Seelig K.
320

Max Purcell defeated Kyle Seelig 6-3 6-2 in the Sydney CH round of 16 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Purcell M.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Seelig K.

Seelig K.serving75% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Purcell M.

Serve advantage — Purcell M.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Purcell M.Seelig K.
1st serve in·Slight edge
60%
65%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
73%
62%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
50%
Service points won·Slight edge
64%
58%
Return points won·Even
37%
38%
Break points saved·Slight edge
62%
54%
Aces / match·Dominant
7.5
1.1
Double faults / match·Slight edge
1.9
2.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (187 vs 20). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Purcell M.
6.8
Slight advantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Seelig K.
5.5
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
7.4
Surface form
1.9
7.03-match win streak
Win streak
0.0Lost last 2
Fatigue & Travel
2.1
Minutes 14d
8.8
4.0
3-set count
7.0
9.0
Prev. match
8.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Hsu Y.
Polmans M.
6-47-65
Semi-finals
Polmans M.
Gengel M.
6-36-4
Hsu Y.
Purcell M.[8]
6-16-4
Quarter-finals
Polmans M.
Whitehouse M.
6-36-1
Gengel M.
Walton A.
6-26-0
Purcell M.[8]
Schoolkate T.
7-646-4
Hsu Y.
Mccabe J.
6-46-0
R16
Schoolkate T.
Saville L.
7-647-64
Hsu Y.
Inui Y.
6-26-1
Whitehouse M.
Mukund S.
3-66-26-0
Walton A.
Vukic A.[3]
7-686-1
Polmans M.
Shimizu Y.
4-66-06-4
Gengel M.
Noguchi R.[7]
7-646-3
Mccabe J.
Bolt A.
6-47-63
Purcell M.[8]
Seelig K.
6-36-2
R32
Inui Y.
Tu L.[4]
6-46-4
Seelig K.
Takahashi Y.
7-56-4
Mukund S.
Duckworth J.[2]
4-66-37-65
Whitehouse M.
Kelly D.
3-66-26-4
Shimizu Y.
Hijikata R.[5]
6-34-67-5
Vukic A.[3]
Sinclair C.
7-636-2
Noguchi R.[7]
Sekulic P.
6-26-4
Bolt A.
Sweeny D.[6]
6-46-1
Schoolkate T.
Jasika O.
6-21-66-3
Hsu Y.
Harper M.
6-16-4
Saville L.
Rai A.
7-646-4
Gengel M.
Beale J.
6-46-0
Mccabe J.
Jin J.
7-617-5
Polmans M.
Statham J.
6-26-2
Walton A.
Ellis B.
4-66-37-65
Purcell M.[8]
Gunneswaran P.
4-67-637-63