Aidan Mchugh vs Cannon Kingsley — Charlottesville CH Qualifying Round 2

Charlottesville CH · CHALLENGER · Qualifying Round 2
GBR3
Aidan Mchugh
#489ATP
26 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWWLLWL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 31 October 2022
hard
USA11
Cannon Kingsley
#421ATP
1342ELO
1345Hard ELO
25 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLWLWWLW
Mchugh A.
5-7 7-6 7-6
Kingsley C.
Mchugh A.
577792
Kingsley C.
765671

Aidan Mchugh defeated Cannon Kingsley 5-7 7-6 7-6 in the Charlottesville CH qualifying round 2 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Mchugh A.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Kingsley C.

Kingsley C.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Mchugh A.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Mchugh A.Kingsley C.
1st serve in·Even
65%
63%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
67%
72%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
52%
Service points won·Even
62%
64%
Return points won·Even
37%
37%
Break points saved·Even
62%
61%
Aces / match·Clear edge
4.2
6.6
Double faults / match·Even
2.3
2.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (93 vs 110). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Mchugh A.Kingsley C.
Clutch Rating·Even
23
21
Break points saved·Even
72
74
Break points won·Clear edge
5
19
Deciding sets·Clear edge
49
27
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
11
20

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Mchugh A.
4.5
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 35 days (−0.7)
Kingsley C.
6.1
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
2.8
Surface form
5.0
0.0Lost last 2
Win streak
0.0Lost last 3
Fatigue & Travel
Minutes 14d
8.5
3-set count
7.0
Prev. match
6.0
Context
6.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Q2
Ponwith N.
Broom C.[5]
6-22-66-2
Rodesch C.
Smith K.[1]
6-46-4
Cassone M.
Kirchheimer S.[9]
4-66-36-1
Leshem E.[4]
Damm M.
6-46-4
Mchugh A.[3]
Kingsley C.[11]
5-77-657-67
Blanch U.[2]
Young D.[12]
6-04-1
Q1
Cassone M.
Chappell N.[6]
7-56-3
Kirchheimer S.[9]
Goetz R.
6-46-4
Mchugh A.[3]
Ross G.
6-34-66-4
Kingsley C.[11]
Farren C.
6-16-4
Blanch U.[2]
Vale D.
6-16-2
Rodesch C.
Clark E.[7]
7-646-3
Damm M.
Brymer G.[8]
6-37-64
Young D.
Mccormick T.
6-46-3
Ponwith N.
Holmgren A.[10]
7-672-66-3
Smith K.[1]
Von Der Schulenburg J.
6-27-5
Young D.[12]
Mccormick T.
6-46-3
Broom C.[5]
Nava E.
7-646-736-4
Leshem E.[4]
Rodenas P.
7-666-1