Nicolas Kicker vs Santiago Fa Rodriguez Taverna — Guayaquil CH Round of 32

Guayaquil CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Nicolas Kicker
ARG
Nicolas Kicker
#322ATP
1385ELO
1373Clay ELO
33 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLWLWWWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 31 October 2022
clay
Santiago Fa Rodriguez Taverna
ARG7
Santiago Fa Rodriguez Taverna
1331ELO
1322Clay ELO
26 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLWLWLL
Kicker N.
6-1 6-4
Rodriguez Taverna S.
Kicker N.
662
Rodriguez Taverna S.
140

Nicolas Kicker defeated Santiago Fa Rodriguez Taverna 6-1 6-4 in the Guayaquil CH round of 32 on clay. The result followed the form book — Nicolas Kicker came in defending last year's quarter-final.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Kicker N.serving68% hold

wins 57% of points on serve vs Rodriguez Taverna S.

Rodriguez Taverna S.serving61% hold

wins 54% of points on serve vs Kicker N.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Kicker N.Rodriguez Taverna S.
1st serve in·Slight edge
68%
60%
1st serve points won·Even
64%
67%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
50%
Service points won·Even
59%
60%
Return points won·Even
42%
38%
Break points saved·Even
58%
60%
Aces / match·Clear edge
1.1
3.6
Double faults / match·Slight edge
1.9
2.6

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (170 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Kicker N.Rodriguez Taverna S.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
30
38
Break points saved·Clear edge
56
72
Break points won·Dominant
45
4
Deciding sets·Dominant
30
76
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
51
39

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Kicker N.
6.1
Even matchUmpiry Score
Rodriguez Taverna S.
6.3
Marginal edgeUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
5.1+52 Clay Elo edge
Surface ELO
4.9Clay Elo 1322
5.2Overall Elo 1385
ELO gap
4.8Overall Elo 1331
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
5.0
Surface form
5.5
0.0
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
5.5
Minutes 14d
4.8
4.0
3-set count
7.0
4.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
7.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Kicker N.Rodriguez Taverna S.
Freshness·Clear edge
100
82

Kicker N.: 18 days rest · Rodriguez Taverna S.: 5 days rest · 1 match, 34 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Altmaier D.[3]
Coria F.[1]
6-26-4
Semi-finals
Altmaier D.[3]
Cecchinato M.
7-646-4
Coria F.[1]
Varillas J.[4]
6-42-67-64
Quarter-finals
Altmaier D.[3]
De Jong J.
6-23-66-3
Coria F.[1]
Pucinelli De Almeida M.
6-46-4
Varillas J.[4]
Kicker N.
6-16-3
Cecchinato M.
Choinski J.
6-16-3
R16
Choinski J.
Cerundolo J.[5]
6-736-26-4
Altmaier D.[3]
Torres J.
6-46-3
Kicker N.
Nagal S.
6-13-67-5
Varillas J.[4]
Guillen Meza A.
6-17-63
Pucinelli De Almeida M.
Meligeni Alves F.[8]
6-36-4
Coria F.[1]
Diaz Acosta F.
3-66-17-62
Cecchinato M.
Burruchaga R.
6-12-0
De Jong J.
Agamenone F.[6]
6-24-66-4
R32
Burruchaga R.
Etcheverry T.[2]
6-737-57-5
Choinski J.
Tirante T.
6-37-65
Cerundolo J.[5]
Melzer G.
6-46-2
Torres J.
Quiroz R.
6-37-62
De Jong J.
Casanova H.
6-16-757-5
Guillen Meza A.
Andrade A.
6-46-3
Varillas J.[4]
Ribeiro E.
6-26-1
Meligeni Alves F.[8]
Galarza J.
6-47-63
Coria F.[1]
Comesana F.
6-27-66
Agamenone F.[6]
March C.
7-56-1
Pucinelli De Almeida M.
Sanchez Izquierdo N.
6-17-68
Diaz Acosta F.
Milojevic N.
7-616-2
Nagal S.
Dutra Da Silva D.
6-26-1
Cecchinato M.
Bicknell B.
6-16-3
Kicker N.
Rodriguez Taverna S.[7]
6-16-4
Altmaier D.[3]
Seyboth Wild T.
1-67-656-2