Paul Jubb vs Michael Mmoh — Charlottesville CH Round of 16

Charlottesville CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
GBR
Paul Jubb
#338ATP
1426ELO
1403Hard ELO
26 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLWWLWLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 31 October 2022
hard
Michael Mmoh
USA2
Michael Mmoh
#188ATP
1613ELO
1599Hard ELO
$85kYTD
$2.4MCAREER
28 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLLLWWWL
Jubb P.
7-6 6-3
Mmoh M.
Jubb P.
7762
Mmoh M.
6430

Paul Jubb defeated Michael Mmoh 7-6 6-3 in the Charlottesville CH round of 16 on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Michael Mmoh came in ranked #188, defending last year's round of 32.

Key context

  • Match story: Paul Jubb closed it out in two sets, 7–6 6–3.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Jubb P.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Mmoh M.

Mmoh M.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Jubb P.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Jubb P.Mmoh M.
1st serve in·Even
61%
65%
1st serve points won·Even
69%
71%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
47%
Service points won·Even
62%
63%
Return points won·Even
40%
40%
Break points saved·Even
61%
62%
Aces / match·Clear edge
4.0
6.0
Double faults / match·Even
3.8
3.8

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (158 vs 199). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Jubb P.Mmoh M.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
38
66
Break points saved·Slight edge
84
91
Break points won·Dominant
6
31
Deciding sets·Dominant
44
90
Tiebreaks·Even
73
77

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Jubb P.
5.1
Clear underdogUmpiry Score
Mmoh M.
8.3
Dominant favouriteUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
2.6Hard Elo 1403
Surface ELO
7.4+196 Hard Elo edge
2.6Overall Elo 1426
ELO gap
7.4Overall Elo 1613
0.0No prior meetings
H2H
10.0
4.5
Surface form
9.2
0.0Lost last 3
Win streak
9.05-match win streak
Fatigue & Travel
9.1
Minutes 14d
9.0
Prev. match
Context
5.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Jubb P.Mmoh M.
Freshness·Slight edge
100
95

Jubb P.: 20 days rest · Mmoh M.: 13 days rest · 2 matches (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Shelton B.[6]
Eubanks C.[4]
7-647-5
Semi-finals
Eubanks C.[4]
Nava E.[8]
7-54-66-3
Shelton B.[6]
Jubb P.
7-663-67-5
Quarter-finals
Shelton B.[6]
Gerch L.
6-37-5
Nava E.[8]
Kudla D.[1]
6-26-1
Jubb P.
Montes De La Torre I.
6-36-2
Eubanks C.[4]
Shang J.
4-66-17-68
R16
Jubb P.
Mmoh M.[2]
7-646-3
Gerch L.
Kozlov S.[3]
6-47-63
Shelton B.[6]
Holt B.
6-36-4
Kudla D.[1]
Blanch U.
7-631-66-2
Eubanks C.[4]
Dougaz A.
7-57-68
Montes De La Torre I.
Kovacevic A.[7]
7-646-4
Shang J.
Leshem E.
1-66-36-2
Nava E.[8]
Mena F.
6-26-1
R32
Shelton B.[6]
Rodesch C.
6-46-3
Kudla D.[1]
Fanselow S.
6-46-3
Montes De La Torre I.
Ayeni O.
6-26-2
Holt B.
Sandgren T.
6-13-66-2
Leshem E.
Galarneau A.
7-56-3
Mena F.
Cassone M.
3-66-37-68
Jubb P.
Mchugh A.
6-746-36-3
Kozlov S.[3]
Krueger M.
7-50-67-61
Shang J.
Ficovich J.[5]
6-43-66-3
Dougaz A.
Svajda Z.
3-66-26-1
Mmoh M.[2]
Escobedo E.
7-657-5
Gerch L.
Quinn E.
6-36-3
Eubanks C.[4]
Alvarez Varona N.
6-17-63
Nava E.[8]
Ponwith N.
5-76-26-3
Blanch U.
Mejia N.
6-46-4
Kovacevic A.[7]
Couacaud E.
6-37-69