Caty Mcnally vs Su Jeong Jang — Midland 125 Round of 16

Midland 125 · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
Caty Mcnally
USA
Caty Mcnally
#57WTA
1817ELO
1731Hard ELO
$711kYTD
$3.7MCAREER
24 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWLWLWW
0 — 0
Sets
Monday, 31 October 2022
hard
KOR
Su Jeong Jang
#657WTA
1384ELO
1355Hard ELO
31 yrs · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWWLLLWW
Mcnally C.
6-3 6-2
Jang S.
Mcnally C.
662
Jang S.
32–

Caty Mcnally defeated Su Jeong Jang 6-3 6-2 in the Midland 125 round of 16 on hard. The result followed the form book — Caty Mcnally came in ranked #57.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Mcnally C.serving56% hold

wins 53% of points on serve vs Jang S.

Jang S.serving49% hold

wins 50% of points on serve vs Mcnally C.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Mcnally C.Jang S.
26
Serve
—
45
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Mcnally C.Jang S.
1st serve in·Even
70%
70%
1st serve points won·Even
62%
61%
2nd serve points won·Even
45%
45%
Service points won·Even
57%
56%
Return points won·Even
46%
44%
Break points saved·Even
54%
56%
Aces / match·Slight edge
1.6
2.2
Double faults / match·Slight edge
3.5
3.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (157 vs 95). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Mcnally C.Jang S.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
73
13
Break points saved·Dominant
73
35
Break points won·Clear edge
99
76
Deciding sets·Dominant
74
14
Tiebreaks·
78
—

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Mcnally C.Jang S.
Freshness·
97
—

Mcnally C.: 12 days rest · 2 matches (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Mcnally C.
Friedsam A.
6-36-2
Semi-finals
Friedsam A.
Li A.
6-46-2
Mcnally C.
Stearns P.
6-16-2
Quarter-finals
Li A.
Hibino N.
2-66-27-5
Friedsam A.
Osorio C.
6-36-3
Stearns P.
Sebov K.
6-46-2
Mcnally C.
Kenin S.
6-30-66-4
R16
Hibino N.
Anderson R.
7-626-3
Li A.
Frech M.
5-76-27-65
Friedsam A.
Vickery S.
6-26-3
Osorio C.
Mandlik E.
6-17-5
Stearns P.
Krueger A.
6-26-3
Sebov K.
Zhu L.
6-46-3
Mcnally C.
Jang S.
6-36-2
Kenin S.
Brengle M.
6-16-3
R32
Hibino N.
Zhang S.
6-46-746-3
Anderson R.
Scott K.
4-67-637-5
Frech M.
Vandeweghe C.
4-67-56-4
Li A.
Gracheva V.
4-67-656-3
Friedsam A.
Chang S.
6-47-67
Vickery S.
Kalieva E.
5-76-36-3
Mandlik E.
Lee G.
6-47-5
Osorio C.
Bouchard E.
1-66-26-2
Krueger A.
Uchijima M.
6-17-611
Stearns P.
Muhammad A.
6-36-4
Sebov K.
Montgomery R.
7-665-76-3
Zhu L.
Chirico L.
6-46-4
Mcnally C.
Parks A.
6-36-1
Jang S.
Day K.
6-33-66-3
Kenin S.
Mateas M.
7-56-2
Brengle M.
Zhao C.
6-46-1