Yuichiro Inui vs Li Tu — Sydney CH Round of 32

Sydney CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
JPN
Yuichiro Inui
#1469ATP
31 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLWWLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 31 October 2022
hard
AUS4
Li Tu
#464ATP
1488ELO
1471Hard ELO
30 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLWWW
Inui Y.
6-4 6-4
Tu L.
Inui Y.
662
Tu L.
440

Yuichiro Inui defeated Li Tu 6-4 6-4 in the Sydney CH round of 32 on hard.

Key context

  • Match story: Yuichiro Inui edged a tight contest from start to finish — 6–4 6–4.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Inui Y.serving74% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Tu L.

Tu L.serving88% hold

wins 69% of points on serve vs Inui Y.

Serve advantage — Tu L.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Inui Y.Tu L.
1st serve in·Slight edge
56%
61%
1st serve points won·Even
68%
72%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
44%
51%
Service points won·Slight edge
57%
64%
Return points won·Even
34%
37%
Break points saved·Slight edge
49%
60%
Aces / match·Even
6.0
6.1
Double faults / match·Even
3.0
2.7

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (10 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Inui Y.
6.2
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Tu L.
6.6
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
Surface form
6.5
0.0Lost last 2
Win streak
0.0Lost last 2
Fatigue & Travel
9.1
Minutes 14d
8.3
3-set count
7.0
8.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Hsu Y.
Polmans M.
6-47-65
Semi-finals
Polmans M.
Gengel M.
6-36-4
Hsu Y.
Purcell M.[8]
6-16-4
Quarter-finals
Polmans M.
Whitehouse M.
6-36-1
Gengel M.
Walton A.
6-26-0
Purcell M.[8]
Schoolkate T.
7-646-4
Hsu Y.
Mccabe J.
6-46-0
R16
Schoolkate T.
Saville L.
7-647-64
Hsu Y.
Inui Y.
6-26-1
Whitehouse M.
Mukund S.
3-66-26-0
Walton A.
Vukic A.[3]
7-686-1
Polmans M.
Shimizu Y.
4-66-06-4
Gengel M.
Noguchi R.[7]
7-646-3
Mccabe J.
Bolt A.
6-47-63
Purcell M.[8]
Seelig K.
6-36-2
R32
Inui Y.
Tu L.[4]
6-46-4
Seelig K.
Takahashi Y.
7-56-4
Mukund S.
Duckworth J.[2]
4-66-37-65
Whitehouse M.
Kelly D.
3-66-26-4
Shimizu Y.
Hijikata R.[5]
6-34-67-5
Vukic A.[3]
Sinclair C.
7-636-2
Noguchi R.[7]
Sekulic P.
6-26-4
Bolt A.
Sweeny D.[6]
6-46-1
Schoolkate T.
Jasika O.
6-21-66-3
Hsu Y.
Harper M.
6-16-4
Saville L.
Rai A.
7-646-4
Gengel M.
Beale J.
6-46-0
Mccabe J.
Jin J.
7-617-5
Polmans M.
Statham J.
6-26-2
Walton A.
Ellis B.
4-66-37-65
Purcell M.[8]
Gunneswaran P.
4-67-637-63