Brandon Holt vs Tennys Sandgren — Charlottesville CH Round of 32

Charlottesville CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
USA
Brandon Holt
#657ATP
1537ELO
1507Hard ELO
28 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLLLLWW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 31 October 2022
hard
USA
Tennys Sandgren
34 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLWWWWW
Holt B.
6-1 3-6 6-2
Sandgren T.
Holt B.
6362
Sandgren T.
1621

Brandon Holt defeated Tennys Sandgren 6-1 3-6 6-2 in the Charlottesville CH round of 32 on hard.

Key context

  • Match story: Brandon Holt closed it out in three sets, 6–1 3–6 6–2.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Holt B.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Sandgren T.

Sandgren T.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Holt B.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Holt B.Sandgren T.
1st serve in·Slight edge
66%
60%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
69%
75%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
50%
Service points won·Even
63%
65%
Return points won·Even
38%
36%
Break points saved·Even
60%
60%
Aces / match·Dominant
4.9
8.3
Double faults / match·Clear edge
1.1
2.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (199 vs 117). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Holt B.Sandgren T.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
58
36
Break points saved·Slight edge
85
92
Break points won·Dominant
31
2
Deciding sets·Dominant
79
28
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
69
86

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Holt B.
6.1
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Sandgren T.
7.7
Dominant favouriteUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
0.0No prior meetings
H2H
10.0
5.9
Surface form
10.0
Win streak
9.07-match win streak
Fatigue & Travel
6.9
Minutes 14d
1.8
7.0
3-set count
4.0
8.0
Prev. match
7.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Shelton B.[6]
Eubanks C.[4]
7-647-5
Semi-finals
Eubanks C.[4]
Nava E.[8]
7-54-66-3
Shelton B.[6]
Jubb P.
7-663-67-5
Quarter-finals
Shelton B.[6]
Gerch L.
6-37-5
Nava E.[8]
Kudla D.[1]
6-26-1
Jubb P.
Montes De La Torre I.
6-36-2
Eubanks C.[4]
Shang J.
4-66-17-68
R16
Jubb P.
Mmoh M.[2]
7-646-3
Gerch L.
Kozlov S.[3]
6-47-63
Shelton B.[6]
Holt B.
6-36-4
Kudla D.[1]
Blanch U.
7-631-66-2
Eubanks C.[4]
Dougaz A.
7-57-68
Montes De La Torre I.
Kovacevic A.[7]
7-646-4
Shang J.
Leshem E.
1-66-36-2
Nava E.[8]
Mena F.
6-26-1
R32
Shelton B.[6]
Rodesch C.
6-46-3
Kudla D.[1]
Fanselow S.
6-46-3
Montes De La Torre I.
Ayeni O.
6-26-2
Holt B.
Sandgren T.
6-13-66-2
Leshem E.
Galarneau A.
7-56-3
Mena F.
Cassone M.
3-66-37-68
Jubb P.
Mchugh A.
6-746-36-3
Kozlov S.[3]
Krueger M.
7-50-67-61
Shang J.
Ficovich J.[5]
6-43-66-3
Dougaz A.
Svajda Z.
3-66-26-1
Mmoh M.[2]
Escobedo E.
7-657-5
Gerch L.
Quinn E.
6-36-3
Eubanks C.[4]
Alvarez Varona N.
6-17-63
Nava E.[8]
Ponwith N.
5-76-26-3
Blanch U.
Mejia N.
6-46-4
Kovacevic A.[7]
Couacaud E.
6-37-69