Ann Li vs Nao Hibino — Midland 125 Quarter-final

Midland 125 · CHALLENGER · Quarter-final
Ann Li
USA
Ann Li
#31WTA
1807ELO
1746Hard ELO
$718kYTD
$3.8MCAREER
26 yrs · 170 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWWLWLWW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 31 October 2022
hard
Nao Hibino
JPN
Nao Hibino
#235WTA
1560ELO
1523Hard ELO
31 yrs · 163 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WLWLLWWLWW
Li A.
2-6 6-2 7-5
Hibino N.
Li A.
2672
Hibino N.
6251

Ann Li defeated Nao Hibino 2-6 6-2 7-5 in the Midland 125 quarter-final on hard. The result followed the form book — Ann Li came in ranked #31.

Key context

  • Match story: Ann Li dropped the opening set before beating Nao Hibino 2–6 6–2 7–5.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Li A.serving59% hold

wins 53% of points on serve vs Hibino N.

Hibino N.serving54% hold

wins 51% of points on serve vs Li A.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Li A.Hibino N.
47
Serve
—
49
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Li A.Hibino N.
1st serve in·Slight edge
60%
67%
1st serve points won·Even
65%
61%
2nd serve points won·Even
46%
47%
Service points won·Even
58%
56%
Return points won·Even
44%
44%
Break points saved·Even
55%
54%
Aces / match·Clear edge
3.5
1.9
Double faults / match·Even
2.4
2.6

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (175 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Li A.Hibino N.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
76
53
Break points saved·Dominant
83
39
Break points won·Even
87
91
Deciding sets·Clear edge
87
66
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
66
81

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Li A.Hibino N.
Freshness·Slight edge
100
91

Li A.: 15 days rest · Hibino N.: 2 days rest · 1 match, 16 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Mcnally C.
Friedsam A.
6-36-2
Semi-finals
Friedsam A.
Li A.
6-46-2
Mcnally C.
Stearns P.
6-16-2
Quarter-finals
Li A.
Hibino N.
2-66-27-5
Friedsam A.
Osorio C.
6-36-3
Stearns P.
Sebov K.
6-46-2
Mcnally C.
Kenin S.
6-30-66-4
R16
Hibino N.
Anderson R.
7-626-3
Li A.
Frech M.
5-76-27-65
Friedsam A.
Vickery S.
6-26-3
Osorio C.
Mandlik E.
6-17-5
Stearns P.
Krueger A.
6-26-3
Sebov K.
Zhu L.
6-46-3
Mcnally C.
Jang S.
6-36-2
Kenin S.
Brengle M.
6-16-3
R32
Hibino N.
Zhang S.
6-46-746-3
Anderson R.
Scott K.
4-67-637-5
Frech M.
Vandeweghe C.
4-67-56-4
Li A.
Gracheva V.
4-67-656-3
Friedsam A.
Chang S.
6-47-67
Vickery S.
Kalieva E.
5-76-36-3
Mandlik E.
Lee G.
6-47-5
Osorio C.
Bouchard E.
1-66-26-2
Krueger A.
Uchijima M.
6-17-611
Stearns P.
Muhammad A.
6-36-4
Sebov K.
Montgomery R.
7-665-76-3
Zhu L.
Chirico L.
6-46-4
Mcnally C.
Parks A.
6-36-1
Jang S.
Day K.
6-33-66-3
Kenin S.
Mateas M.
7-56-2
Brengle M.
Zhao C.
6-46-1