Max Purcell vs Prajnesh Gunneswaran — Sydney CH Round of 32

Sydney CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
AUS8
Max Purcell
28 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLLLLWW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 31 October 2022
hard
IND
Prajnesh Gunneswaran
36 yrs · 188 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLLWLWLL
Purcell M.
4-6 7-6 7-6
Gunneswaran P.
Purcell M.
477772
Gunneswaran P.
663631

Max Purcell defeated Prajnesh Gunneswaran 4-6 7-6 7-6 in the Sydney CH round of 32 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Purcell M.serving88% hold

wins 68% of points on serve vs Gunneswaran P.

Gunneswaran P.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Purcell M.

Serve advantage — Purcell M.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Purcell M.Gunneswaran P.
1st serve in·Even
60%
63%
1st serve points won·Even
73%
70%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
49%
Service points won·Even
64%
62%
Return points won·Even
37%
35%
Break points saved·Even
62%
62%
Aces / match·Clear edge
7.4
5.6
Double faults / match·Even
1.9
2.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (187 vs 36). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Purcell M.Gunneswaran P.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
59
24
Break points saved·Slight edge
92
84
Break points won·Even
10
14
Deciding sets·Dominant
84
37
Tiebreaks·Dominant
81
4

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Purcell M.
6.8
Slight advantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Gunneswaran P.
5.6
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
7.4
Surface form
2.5
7.03-match win streak
Win streak
0.0Lost last 2
Fatigue & Travel
2.1
Minutes 14d
9.3
4.0
3-set count
9.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Hsu Y.
Polmans M.
6-47-65
Semi-finals
Polmans M.
Gengel M.
6-36-4
Hsu Y.
Purcell M.[8]
6-16-4
Quarter-finals
Polmans M.
Whitehouse M.
6-36-1
Gengel M.
Walton A.
6-26-0
Purcell M.[8]
Schoolkate T.
7-646-4
Hsu Y.
Mccabe J.
6-46-0
R16
Schoolkate T.
Saville L.
7-647-64
Hsu Y.
Inui Y.
6-26-1
Whitehouse M.
Mukund S.
3-66-26-0
Walton A.
Vukic A.[3]
7-686-1
Polmans M.
Shimizu Y.
4-66-06-4
Gengel M.
Noguchi R.[7]
7-646-3
Mccabe J.
Bolt A.
6-47-63
Purcell M.[8]
Seelig K.
6-36-2
R32
Inui Y.
Tu L.[4]
6-46-4
Seelig K.
Takahashi Y.
7-56-4
Mukund S.
Duckworth J.[2]
4-66-37-65
Whitehouse M.
Kelly D.
3-66-26-4
Shimizu Y.
Hijikata R.[5]
6-34-67-5
Vukic A.[3]
Sinclair C.
7-636-2
Noguchi R.[7]
Sekulic P.
6-26-4
Bolt A.
Sweeny D.[6]
6-46-1
Schoolkate T.
Jasika O.
6-21-66-3
Hsu Y.
Harper M.
6-16-4
Saville L.
Rai A.
7-646-4
Gengel M.
Beale J.
6-46-0
Mccabe J.
Jin J.
7-617-5
Polmans M.
Statham J.
6-26-2
Walton A.
Ellis B.
4-66-37-65
Purcell M.[8]
Gunneswaran P.
4-67-637-63