Marek Gengel vs Adam Walton — Sydney CH Quarter-final

Sydney CH · CHALLENGER · Quarter-final
Marek Gengel
CZE
Marek Gengel
#373ATP
1411ELO
1377Hard ELO
30 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWWWLWWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 31 October 2022
hard
Adam Walton
AUS
Adam Walton
#79ATP
1703ELO
1669Hard ELO
$499kYTD
$2.3MCAREER
27 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWLLWWW
Gengel M.
6-2 6-0
Walton A.
Gengel M.
662
Walton A.
200

Marek Gengel defeated Adam Walton 6-2 6-0 in the Sydney CH quarter-final on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Adam Walton came in ranked #79.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Gengel M.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Walton A.

Walton A.serving86% hold

wins 67% of points on serve vs Gengel M.

Serve advantage — Walton A.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Gengel M.Walton A.
—
Serve
35
—
Return
17

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Gengel M.Walton A.
1st serve in·Even
63%
63%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
68%
73%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
46%
53%
Service points won·Slight edge
60%
66%
Return points won·Even
38%
37%
Break points saved·Slight edge
56%
62%
Aces / match·Slight edge
4.9
6.2
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.9
1.9

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (130 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Gengel M.Walton A.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
11
65
Break points saved·Dominant
35
95
Break points won·Slight edge
10
20
Deciding sets·Dominant
54
95
Tiebreaks·Dominant
4
70

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Gengel M.
5.0
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
Walton A.
7.0
Strong advantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
1.8Hard Elo 1377
Surface ELO
8.2+292 Hard Elo edge
1.8Overall Elo 1411
ELO gap
8.2Overall Elo 1703
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
4.0
Surface form
0.0
Win streak
0.0Lost last 4
Fatigue & Travel
5.1
Minutes 14d
8.6
0.0
3-set count
7.0
7.0
Prev. match
7.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Gengel M.Walton A.
Freshness·
—
54

Walton A.: 2 days rest · 5 matches, 122 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Hsu Y.
Polmans M.
6-47-65
Semi-finals
Polmans M.
Gengel M.
6-36-4
Hsu Y.
Purcell M.[8]
6-16-4
Quarter-finals
Polmans M.
Whitehouse M.
6-36-1
Gengel M.
Walton A.
6-26-0
Purcell M.[8]
Schoolkate T.
7-646-4
Hsu Y.
Mccabe J.
6-46-0
R16
Schoolkate T.
Saville L.
7-647-64
Hsu Y.
Inui Y.
6-26-1
Whitehouse M.
Mukund S.
3-66-26-0
Walton A.
Vukic A.[3]
7-686-1
Polmans M.
Shimizu Y.
4-66-06-4
Gengel M.
Noguchi R.[7]
7-646-3
Mccabe J.
Bolt A.
6-47-63
Purcell M.[8]
Seelig K.
6-36-2
R32
Inui Y.
Tu L.[4]
6-46-4
Seelig K.
Takahashi Y.
7-56-4
Mukund S.
Duckworth J.[2]
4-66-37-65
Whitehouse M.
Kelly D.
3-66-26-4
Shimizu Y.
Hijikata R.[5]
6-34-67-5
Vukic A.[3]
Sinclair C.
7-636-2
Noguchi R.[7]
Sekulic P.
6-26-4
Bolt A.
Sweeny D.[6]
6-46-1
Schoolkate T.
Jasika O.
6-21-66-3
Hsu Y.
Harper M.
6-16-4
Saville L.
Rai A.
7-646-4
Gengel M.
Beale J.
6-46-0
Mccabe J.
Jin J.
7-617-5
Polmans M.
Statham J.
6-26-2
Walton A.
Ellis B.
4-66-37-65
Purcell M.[8]
Gunneswaran P.
4-67-637-63