Adam Walton vs Blake Ellis — Sydney CH Round of 32

Sydney CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Adam Walton
AUS
Adam Walton
#79ATP
1703ELO
1669Hard ELO
$499kYTD
$2.3MCAREER
27 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWLLWWW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 31 October 2022
hard
AUS
Blake Ellis
#472ATP
1416ELO
1390Hard ELO
27 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLLLLLWW
Walton A.
4-6 6-3 7-6
Ellis B.
Walton A.
46772
Ellis B.
63651

Adam Walton defeated Blake Ellis 4-6 6-3 7-6 in the Sydney CH round of 32 on hard. The result followed the form book — Adam Walton came in ranked #79.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Walton A.serving89% hold

wins 69% of points on serve vs Ellis B.

Ellis B.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Walton A.

Serve advantage — Walton A.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Walton A.Ellis B.
35
Serve
—
17
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Walton A.Ellis B.
1st serve in·Slight edge
63%
57%
1st serve points won·Even
73%
71%
2nd serve points won·Even
53%
49%
Service points won·Even
66%
62%
Return points won·Even
37%
36%
Break points saved·Even
62%
60%
Aces / match·Clear edge
6.2
7.9
Double faults / match·Clear edge
1.9
3.1

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 98). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Walton A.Ellis B.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
65
41
Break points saved·Clear edge
95
79
Break points won·Clear edge
20
3
Deciding sets·Clear edge
95
78
Tiebreaks·Dominant
70
37

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Walton A.
6.8
Slight advantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Ellis B.
5.0
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
7.4+279 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
2.6Hard Elo 1390
7.5Overall Elo 1703
ELO gap
2.5Overall Elo 1416
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
Surface form
2.5
0.0Lost last 4
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
8.6
Minutes 14d
8.2
7.0
3-set count
7.0
Prev. match
8.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Walton A.Ellis B.
Freshness·Dominant
54
92

Walton A.: 2 days rest · 5 matches, 122 games (7d) · Ellis B.: 9 days rest · 3 matches (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Hsu Y.
Polmans M.
6-47-65
Semi-finals
Polmans M.
Gengel M.
6-36-4
Hsu Y.
Purcell M.[8]
6-16-4
Quarter-finals
Polmans M.
Whitehouse M.
6-36-1
Gengel M.
Walton A.
6-26-0
Purcell M.[8]
Schoolkate T.
7-646-4
Hsu Y.
Mccabe J.
6-46-0
R16
Schoolkate T.
Saville L.
7-647-64
Hsu Y.
Inui Y.
6-26-1
Whitehouse M.
Mukund S.
3-66-26-0
Walton A.
Vukic A.[3]
7-686-1
Polmans M.
Shimizu Y.
4-66-06-4
Gengel M.
Noguchi R.[7]
7-646-3
Mccabe J.
Bolt A.
6-47-63
Purcell M.[8]
Seelig K.
6-36-2
R32
Inui Y.
Tu L.[4]
6-46-4
Seelig K.
Takahashi Y.
7-56-4
Mukund S.
Duckworth J.[2]
4-66-37-65
Whitehouse M.
Kelly D.
3-66-26-4
Shimizu Y.
Hijikata R.[5]
6-34-67-5
Vukic A.[3]
Sinclair C.
7-636-2
Noguchi R.[7]
Sekulic P.
6-26-4
Bolt A.
Sweeny D.[6]
6-46-1
Schoolkate T.
Jasika O.
6-21-66-3
Hsu Y.
Harper M.
6-16-4
Saville L.
Rai A.
7-646-4
Gengel M.
Beale J.
6-46-0
Mccabe J.
Jin J.
7-617-5
Polmans M.
Statham J.
6-26-2
Walton A.
Ellis B.
4-66-37-65
Purcell M.[8]
Gunneswaran P.
4-67-637-63