Edan Leshem vs Martin Damm — Charlottesville CH Qualifying Round 2

Charlottesville CH · CHALLENGER · Qualifying Round 2
ISR4
Edan Leshem
29 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLLWWLLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 31 October 2022
hard
Martin Damm
USA
Martin Damm
#104ATP
1706ELO
1657Hard ELO
$338kYTD
$910kCAREER
22 yrs · 203 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWLWWWL
Leshem E.
6-4 6-4
Damm M.
Leshem E.
662
Damm M.
440

Edan Leshem defeated Martin Damm 6-4 6-4 in the Charlottesville CH qualifying round 2 on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Martin Damm came in defending last year's round of 32.

Key context

  • Match story: Edan Leshem edged a tight contest from start to finish — 6–4 6–4.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Leshem E.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Damm M.

Damm M.serving88% hold

wins 68% of points on serve vs Leshem E.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Leshem E.Damm M.
1st serve in·Even
60%
60%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
68%
78%
2nd serve points won·Even
48%
51%
Service points won·Slight edge
60%
67%
Return points won·Slight edge
38%
33%
Break points saved·Slight edge
59%
66%
Aces / match·Dominant
2.5
12.3
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.4
4.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (41 vs 163). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Leshem E.Damm M.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
1
26
Break points saved·Dominant
47
93
Break points won·Slight edge
7
1
Deciding sets·Slight edge
11
5
Tiebreaks·Dominant
20
84

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Leshem E.
5.8
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Damm M.
5.7
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
3.4
Surface form
3.1
0.0Lost last 3
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
9.0
Minutes 14d
8.0
Prev. match
6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Leshem E.Damm M.
Freshness·
—
97

Damm M.: 13 days rest · 1 match (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Q2
Ponwith N.
Broom C.[5]
6-22-66-2
Rodesch C.
Smith K.[1]
6-46-4
Cassone M.
Kirchheimer S.[9]
4-66-36-1
Leshem E.[4]
Damm M.
6-46-4
Mchugh A.[3]
Kingsley C.[11]
5-77-657-67
Blanch U.[2]
Young D.[12]
6-04-1
Q1
Cassone M.
Chappell N.[6]
7-56-3
Kirchheimer S.[9]
Goetz R.
6-46-4
Mchugh A.[3]
Ross G.
6-34-66-4
Kingsley C.[11]
Farren C.
6-16-4
Blanch U.[2]
Vale D.
6-16-2
Rodesch C.
Clark E.[7]
7-646-3
Damm M.
Brymer G.[8]
6-37-64
Young D.
Mccormick T.
6-46-3
Ponwith N.
Holmgren A.[10]
7-672-66-3
Smith K.[1]
Von Der Schulenburg J.
6-27-5
Young D.[12]
Mccormick T.
6-46-3
Broom C.[5]
Nava E.
7-646-736-4
Leshem E.[4]
Rodenas P.
7-666-1