Altug Celikbilek vs Alibek Kachmazov — Bergamo CH Round of 32

Bergamo CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
TUR
Altug Celikbilek
29 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWLLWWWL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 31 October 2022
hard
RUS
Alibek Kachmazov
#782ATP
1490ELO
1467Hard ELO
23 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLWLL
Celikbilek A.
6-4 2-6 7-5
Kachmazov A.
Celikbilek A.
6272
Kachmazov A.
4651

Altug Celikbilek defeated Alibek Kachmazov 6-4 2-6 7-5 in the Bergamo CH round of 32 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Celikbilek A.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Kachmazov A.

Kachmazov A.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Celikbilek A.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Celikbilek A.Kachmazov A.
1st serve in·Even
59%
56%
1st serve points won·Even
70%
70%
2nd serve points won·Even
48%
51%
Service points won·Even
61%
62%
Return points won·Even
38%
38%
Break points saved·Even
60%
60%
Aces / match·Even
6.0
5.4
Double faults / match·Even
3.4
3.4

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (124 vs 196). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Celikbilek A.Kachmazov A.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
40
49
Break points saved·Slight edge
73
82
Break points won·Clear edge
38
16
Deciding sets·Even
57
61
Tiebreaks·Dominant
26
87

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Celikbilek A.
6.0
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Kachmazov A.
6.1
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
4.9
Surface form
4.1
0.0
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
8.6
Minutes 14d
7.4
7.0
3-set count
7.0
7.0
Prev. match
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Virtanen O.
Struff J.
6-27-5
Semi-finals
Virtanen O.
Borges N.[2]
6-47-5
Struff J.
Rodionov J.
2-66-46-2
Quarter-finals
Struff J.
Arnaldi M.
4-66-16-4
Borges N.[2]
Vavassori A.
6-46-4
Virtanen O.
Stricker D.
6-47-65
Rodionov J.
Hanfmann Y.
4-66-46-4
R16
Vavassori A.
Gojo B.
6-16-2
Virtanen O.
Zhang Z.[3]
6-47-67
Struff J.
Nardi L.
6-47-61
Arnaldi M.
Broady L.
6-41-66-3
Rodionov J.
Celikbilek A.
6-26-4
Hanfmann Y.
Shevchenko A.
7-664-66-0
Stricker D.
Kopriva V.
6-47-5
Borges N.[2]
Novak D.
6-34-2
R32
Broady L.
Bergs Z.
7-54-1
Struff J.
Cobolli F.
6-16-2
Novak D.
Ilkel C.
6-26-4
Gojo B.
Karlovskiy E.
7-56-0
Zhang Z.[3]
Zeppieri G.
3-66-36-4
Stricker D.
Van Rijthoven T.[5]
3-66-46-4
Nardi L.
Machac T.[6]
7-57-63
Arnaldi M.
Barrere G.[4]
6-36-1
Hanfmann Y.
Piros Z.
5-76-26-2
Rodionov J.
Verdasco F.[8]
6-26-3
Borges N.[2]
Kovalik J.
7-56-3
Shevchenko A.
Majchrzak K.[1]
6-47-5
Celikbilek A.
Kachmazov A.
6-42-67-5
Virtanen O.
Guinard M.
6-47-5
Kopriva V.
Kuzmanov D.
4-66-26-1
Vavassori A.
Jarry N.[7]
7-647-64