Nathan Ponwith vs Charles Broom — Charlottesville CH Qualifying Round 2

Charlottesville CH · CHALLENGER · Qualifying Round 2
USA
Nathan Ponwith
#1273ATP
28 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWWLLWWL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 31 October 2022
hard
GBR5
Charles Broom
#283ATP
1409ELO
1396Hard ELO
28 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWWLWWLL
Ponwith N.
6-2 2-6 6-2
Broom C.
Ponwith N.
6262
Broom C.
2621

Nathan Ponwith defeated Charles Broom 6-2 2-6 6-2 in the Charlottesville CH qualifying round 2 on hard.

Key context

  • Match story: Nathan Ponwith closed it out in three sets, 6–2 2–6 6–2.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Ponwith N.serving74% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Broom C.

Broom C.serving88% hold

wins 68% of points on serve vs Ponwith N.

Serve advantage — Broom C.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Ponwith N.Broom C.
1st serve in·Even
59%
62%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
65%
71%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
49%
Service points won·Even
59%
63%
Return points won·Even
34%
38%
Break points saved·Even
59%
59%
Aces / match·Dominant
3.1
6.3
Double faults / match·Slight edge
3.3
2.9

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (61 vs 144). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Ponwith N.
5.8
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Broom C.
5.6
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
3.1
Surface form
3.0
Win streak
0.0Lost last 5
Fatigue & Travel
7.8
Minutes 14d
7.0
3-set count
8.0
Prev. match
7.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Ponwith N.Broom C.
Freshness·
—
77

Broom C.: 1 day rest · 1 match, 30 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Q2
Ponwith N.
Broom C.[5]
6-22-66-2
Rodesch C.
Smith K.[1]
6-46-4
Cassone M.
Kirchheimer S.[9]
4-66-36-1
Leshem E.[4]
Damm M.
6-46-4
Mchugh A.[3]
Kingsley C.[11]
5-77-657-67
Blanch U.[2]
Young D.[12]
6-04-1
Q1
Cassone M.
Chappell N.[6]
7-56-3
Kirchheimer S.[9]
Goetz R.
6-46-4
Mchugh A.[3]
Ross G.
6-34-66-4
Kingsley C.[11]
Farren C.
6-16-4
Blanch U.[2]
Vale D.
6-16-2
Rodesch C.
Clark E.[7]
7-646-3
Damm M.
Brymer G.[8]
6-37-64
Young D.
Mccormick T.
6-46-3
Ponwith N.
Holmgren A.[10]
7-672-66-3
Smith K.[1]
Von Der Schulenburg J.
6-27-5
Young D.[12]
Mccormick T.
6-46-3
Broom C.[5]
Nava E.
7-646-736-4
Leshem E.[4]
Rodenas P.
7-666-1