Juncheng Shang vs Alfredo Perez — Las Vegas CH Round of 16

Las Vegas CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
CHN
Juncheng Shang
#274ATP
1746ELO
1698Hard ELO
21 yrs · 180 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLWWLWW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 24 October 2022
hard
USA
Alfredo Perez
#636ATP
1372ELO
1333Hard ELO
29 yrs · 193 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLLWLWLW
Shang J.
7-6 4-6 6-3
Perez A.
Shang J.
77462
Perez A.
63631

Juncheng Shang defeated Alfredo Perez 7-6 4-6 6-3 in the Las Vegas CH round of 16 on hard.

Key context

  • Match story: Juncheng Shang closed it out in three sets, 7–6 4–6 6–3.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Shang J.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Perez A.

Perez A.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Shang J.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Shang J.Perez A.
34
Serve
—
18
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Shang J.Perez A.
1st serve in·Even
64%
62%
1st serve points won·Even
70%
70%
2nd serve points won·Even
53%
51%
Service points won·Even
64%
63%
Return points won·Even
37%
39%
Break points saved·Even
62%
63%
Aces / match·Slight edge
3.7
4.7
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.6
2.2

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (197 vs 98). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Shang J.Perez A.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
76
23
Break points saved·Clear edge
96
72
Break points won·Dominant
45
1
Deciding sets·Dominant
94
47
Tiebreaks·Dominant
86
21

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Shang J.
7.6
Dominant favouriteUmpiry Score
Perez A.
5.3
Clear underdogUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
9.6+365 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
0.4Hard Elo 1333
9.7Overall Elo 1746
ELO gap
0.3Overall Elo 1372
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
5.5
Surface form
6.3
Win streak
7.03-match win streak
Fatigue & Travel
6.9
Minutes 14d
6.1
7.0
3-set count
7.0
8.0
Prev. match
7.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Sandgren T.
Kozlov S.[4]
7-56-3
Semi-finals
Kozlov S.[4]
Johnson S.[2]
6-31-67-5
Sandgren T.
Shang J.
6-37-65
Quarter-finals
Johnson S.[2]
Ficovich J.[5]
6-10-0
Kozlov S.[4]
Galarneau A.
6-756-46-3
Shang J.
Escobedo E.
6-43-66-3
Sandgren T.
Holt B.
6-776-26-3
R16
Galarneau A.
Nanda G.
6-12-1
Sandgren T.
Pinnington Jones J.
7-56-3
Escobedo E.
Shelton B.[6]
6-26-3
Johnson S.[2]
Krueger M.
7-56-3
Holt B.
Kovacevic A.[8]
7-617-5
Shang J.
Perez A.
7-634-66-3
Kozlov S.[4]
Zhu E.
7-656-2
Ficovich J.[5]
Diallo G.
3-67-656-4
R32
Johnson S.[2]
Elias G.
5-76-37-5
Diallo G.
Couacaud E.
6-46-4
Kozlov S.[4]
Kingsley C.
7-54-66-1
Galarneau A.
Mena F.[7]
6-10-66-4
Kovacevic A.[8]
Nava E.
7-676-2
Krueger M.
Carr S.
7-56-4
Pinnington Jones J.
Pospisil V.[3]
6-43-66-2
Shelton B.[6]
Vacherot V.
6-747-646-4
Shang J.
Cozbinov A.
6-43-66-3
Holt B.
Verboven M.
6-26-2
Escobedo E.
Kumar O.
6-16-4
Sandgren T.
Fanselow S.
3-67-56-3
Ficovich J.[5]
Jubb P.
6-37-5
Nanda G.
Mejia N.
7-616-4
Perez A.
Kudla D.[1]
6-46-3
Zhu E.
Mayo A.
6-47-69