Alfredo Perez vs Denis Kudla — Las Vegas CH Round of 32

Las Vegas CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
USA
Alfredo Perez
#636ATP
1372ELO
1333Hard ELO
29 yrs · 193 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLLWLWLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 24 October 2022
hard
USA1
Denis Kudla
33 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLWWLLW
Perez A.
6-4 6-3
Kudla D.
Perez A.
662
Kudla D.
430

Alfredo Perez defeated Denis Kudla 6-4 6-3 in the Las Vegas CH round of 32 on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Denis Kudla came in defending last year's round of 16, but Alfredo Perez had arrived on a 3-match winning run.

Key context

  • Match story: Alfredo Perez closed it out in two sets, 6–4 6–3.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Perez A.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Kudla D.

Kudla D.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Perez A.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Perez A.Kudla D.
1st serve in·Even
62%
60%
1st serve points won·Even
70%
71%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
52%
Service points won·Even
63%
63%
Return points won·Even
39%
37%
Break points saved·Even
62%
60%
Aces / match·Slight edge
4.6
5.5
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.3
2.6

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (98 vs 167). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Perez A.Kudla D.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
23
50
Break points saved·Clear edge
72
90
Break points won·Clear edge
1
19
Deciding sets·Dominant
47
81
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
21
30

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Perez A.
6.6
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Kudla D.
6.8
Slight advantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
6.3
Surface form
7.2
7.03-match win streak
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
6.1
Minutes 14d
7.0
3-set count
7.0
Prev. match
Context
6.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Sandgren T.
Kozlov S.[4]
7-56-3
Semi-finals
Kozlov S.[4]
Johnson S.[2]
6-31-67-5
Sandgren T.
Shang J.
6-37-65
Quarter-finals
Johnson S.[2]
Ficovich J.[5]
6-10-0
Kozlov S.[4]
Galarneau A.
6-756-46-3
Shang J.
Escobedo E.
6-43-66-3
Sandgren T.
Holt B.
6-776-26-3
R16
Galarneau A.
Nanda G.
6-12-1
Sandgren T.
Pinnington Jones J.
7-56-3
Escobedo E.
Shelton B.[6]
6-26-3
Johnson S.[2]
Krueger M.
7-56-3
Holt B.
Kovacevic A.[8]
7-617-5
Shang J.
Perez A.
7-634-66-3
Kozlov S.[4]
Zhu E.
7-656-2
Ficovich J.[5]
Diallo G.
3-67-656-4
R32
Johnson S.[2]
Elias G.
5-76-37-5
Diallo G.
Couacaud E.
6-46-4
Kozlov S.[4]
Kingsley C.
7-54-66-1
Galarneau A.
Mena F.[7]
6-10-66-4
Kovacevic A.[8]
Nava E.
7-676-2
Krueger M.
Carr S.
7-56-4
Pinnington Jones J.
Pospisil V.[3]
6-43-66-2
Shelton B.[6]
Vacherot V.
6-747-646-4
Shang J.
Cozbinov A.
6-43-66-3
Holt B.
Verboven M.
6-26-2
Escobedo E.
Kumar O.
6-16-4
Sandgren T.
Fanselow S.
3-67-56-3
Ficovich J.[5]
Jubb P.
6-37-5
Nanda G.
Mejia N.
7-616-4
Perez A.
Kudla D.[1]
6-46-3
Zhu E.
Mayo A.
6-47-69