Tennys Sandgren vs Brandon Holt — Las Vegas CH Quarter-final

Las Vegas CH · CHALLENGER · Quarter-final
USA
Tennys Sandgren
34 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLWWWWW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 24 October 2022
hard
USA
Brandon Holt
#657ATP
1537ELO
1507Hard ELO
28 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLLLLWW
Sandgren T.
6-7 6-2 6-3
Holt B.
Sandgren T.
67662
Holt B.
79231

Tennys Sandgren defeated Brandon Holt 6-7 6-2 6-3 in the Las Vegas CH quarter-final on hard. The result followed the form book — Tennys Sandgren came in defending last year's round of 32.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Sandgren T.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Holt B.

Holt B.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Sandgren T.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Sandgren T.Holt B.
1st serve in·Slight edge
60%
66%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
74%
69%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
51%
Service points won·Even
65%
63%
Return points won·Even
36%
39%
Break points saved·Even
60%
61%
Aces / match·Dominant
8.3
4.9
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.5
1.1

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (117 vs 199). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Sandgren T.Holt B.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
36
58
Break points saved·Slight edge
92
85
Break points won·Dominant
2
31
Deciding sets·Dominant
28
79
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
86
69

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Sandgren T.
6.4
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Holt B.
6.1
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
6.0
Surface form
4.8
Win streak
0.0Lost last 2
Fatigue & Travel
4.5
Minutes 14d
7.0
3-set count
7.0
Prev. match
Context
6.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Sandgren T.
Kozlov S.[4]
7-56-3
Semi-finals
Kozlov S.[4]
Johnson S.[2]
6-31-67-5
Sandgren T.
Shang J.
6-37-65
Quarter-finals
Johnson S.[2]
Ficovich J.[5]
6-10-0
Kozlov S.[4]
Galarneau A.
6-756-46-3
Shang J.
Escobedo E.
6-43-66-3
Sandgren T.
Holt B.
6-776-26-3
R16
Galarneau A.
Nanda G.
6-12-1
Sandgren T.
Pinnington Jones J.
7-56-3
Escobedo E.
Shelton B.[6]
6-26-3
Johnson S.[2]
Krueger M.
7-56-3
Holt B.
Kovacevic A.[8]
7-617-5
Shang J.
Perez A.
7-634-66-3
Kozlov S.[4]
Zhu E.
7-656-2
Ficovich J.[5]
Diallo G.
3-67-656-4
R32
Johnson S.[2]
Elias G.
5-76-37-5
Diallo G.
Couacaud E.
6-46-4
Kozlov S.[4]
Kingsley C.
7-54-66-1
Galarneau A.
Mena F.[7]
6-10-66-4
Kovacevic A.[8]
Nava E.
7-676-2
Krueger M.
Carr S.
7-56-4
Pinnington Jones J.
Pospisil V.[3]
6-43-66-2
Shelton B.[6]
Vacherot V.
6-747-646-4
Shang J.
Cozbinov A.
6-43-66-3
Holt B.
Verboven M.
6-26-2
Escobedo E.
Kumar O.
6-16-4
Sandgren T.
Fanselow S.
3-67-56-3
Ficovich J.[5]
Jubb P.
6-37-5
Nanda G.
Mejia N.
7-616-4
Perez A.
Kudla D.[1]
6-46-3
Zhu E.
Mayo A.
6-47-69