Ernesto Escobedo vs Omni Kumar — Las Vegas CH Round of 32

Las Vegas CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
MEX
Ernesto Escobedo
#1650ATP
30 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLLLWWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 24 October 2022
hard
USA
Omni Kumar
24 yrs · 173 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLWWLLWL
Escobedo E.
6-1 6-4
Kumar O.
Escobedo E.
662
Kumar O.
140

Ernesto Escobedo defeated Omni Kumar 6-1 6-4 in the Las Vegas CH round of 32 on hard. The result followed the form book — Ernesto Escobedo came in defending last year's quarter-final.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Escobedo E.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Kumar O.

Kumar O.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Escobedo E.

Serve advantage — Escobedo E.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Escobedo E.Kumar O.
1st serve in·Slight edge
63%
53%
1st serve points won·Even
71%
68%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
49%
Service points won·Slight edge
64%
59%
Return points won·Even
37%
38%
Break points saved·Even
61%
57%
Aces / match·Clear edge
5.2
3.4
Double faults / match·Even
2.7
2.7

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (121 vs 65). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Escobedo E.
6.0
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Kumar O.
5.3
Clear underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
4.0
Surface form
1.1
0.0
Win streak
0.0Lost last 3
Fatigue & Travel
8.7
Minutes 14d
9.2
7.0
3-set count
7.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
7.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Sandgren T.
Kozlov S.[4]
7-56-3
Semi-finals
Kozlov S.[4]
Johnson S.[2]
6-31-67-5
Sandgren T.
Shang J.
6-37-65
Quarter-finals
Johnson S.[2]
Ficovich J.[5]
6-10-0
Kozlov S.[4]
Galarneau A.
6-756-46-3
Shang J.
Escobedo E.
6-43-66-3
Sandgren T.
Holt B.
6-776-26-3
R16
Galarneau A.
Nanda G.
6-12-1
Sandgren T.
Pinnington Jones J.
7-56-3
Escobedo E.
Shelton B.[6]
6-26-3
Johnson S.[2]
Krueger M.
7-56-3
Holt B.
Kovacevic A.[8]
7-617-5
Shang J.
Perez A.
7-634-66-3
Kozlov S.[4]
Zhu E.
7-656-2
Ficovich J.[5]
Diallo G.
3-67-656-4
R32
Johnson S.[2]
Elias G.
5-76-37-5
Diallo G.
Couacaud E.
6-46-4
Kozlov S.[4]
Kingsley C.
7-54-66-1
Galarneau A.
Mena F.[7]
6-10-66-4
Kovacevic A.[8]
Nava E.
7-676-2
Krueger M.
Carr S.
7-56-4
Pinnington Jones J.
Pospisil V.[3]
6-43-66-2
Shelton B.[6]
Vacherot V.
6-747-646-4
Shang J.
Cozbinov A.
6-43-66-3
Holt B.
Verboven M.
6-26-2
Escobedo E.
Kumar O.
6-16-4
Sandgren T.
Fanselow S.
3-67-56-3
Ficovich J.[5]
Jubb P.
6-37-5
Nanda G.
Mejia N.
7-616-4
Perez A.
Kudla D.[1]
6-46-3
Zhu E.
Mayo A.
6-47-69