Alfredo Perez vs Ezekiel Clark — Las Vegas CH Qualifying Round 2

Las Vegas CH · CHALLENGER · Qualifying Round 2
USA
Alfredo Perez
#636ATP
1372ELO
1333Hard ELO
29 yrs · 193 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLLWLWLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 24 October 2022
hard
USA9
Ezekiel Clark
#1280ATP
27 yrs · 170 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWLLLLWLLW
Perez A.
6-2 7-6
Clark E.
Perez A.
6782
Clark E.
2660

Alfredo Perez defeated Ezekiel Clark 6-2 7-6 in the Las Vegas CH qualifying round 2 on hard.

Key context

  • Match story: Alfredo Perez closed it out in two sets, 6–2 7–6.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Perez A.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Clark E.

Clark E.serving66% hold

wins 57% of points on serve vs Perez A.

Serve advantage — Perez A.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Perez A.Clark E.
1st serve in·Slight edge
62%
68%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
70%
59%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
52%
47%
Service points won·Slight edge
63%
56%
Return points won·Even
39%
40%
Break points saved·Slight edge
62%
54%
Aces / match·Dominant
4.6
1.4
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.3
3.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (98 vs 38). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Perez A.
6.6
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Clark E.
5.7
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
6.3
Surface form
3.4
7.03-match win streak
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
6.1
Minutes 14d
6.8
7.0
3-set count
4.0
7.0
Prev. match
7.0
Context
6.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Q2
Perez A.
Clark E.[9]
6-27-66
Carr S.
Young D.[11]
3-66-36-3
Sandgren T.[5]
Bernard A.
6-27-5
Pinnington Jones J.
Ponwith N.
6-36-3
Mayo A.
Vale D.[12]
6-46-4
Kumar O.[8]
Svajda Z.[1]
6-23-0
Q1
Pinnington Jones J.
Leshem E.[2]
7-56-3
Vale D.[12]
Rsovac D.
6-26-4
Kumar O.[8]
Michelsen A.
6-47-5
Svajda Z.[1]
Dabic M.
6-16-0
Ponwith N.
Pervolarakis M.[7]
6-32-66-1
Sandgren T.
Mccormick T.
6-17-67
Sandgren T.[5]
Mccormick T.
6-17-67
Mayo A.
Langmo C.[6]
5-0
Bernard A.
Brymer G.[10]
6-21-66-2
Young D.[11]
Ornberg A.
6-04-66-2
Carr S.
Chappell N.[4]
6-27-5
Clark E.[9]
Mcnally J.
6-47-61
Perez A.
Lock B.[3]
6-36-4