Ignacio Buse vs Daniel Dutra Da Silva — Lima CH Round of 32

Lima CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Ignacio Buse
PER
Ignacio Buse
#33ATP
1822ELO
1786Clay ELO
$949kYTD
$1.4MCAREER
22 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLWLWWW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 24 October 2022
clay
BRA
Daniel Dutra Da Silva
#426ATP
1307ELO
1282Clay ELO
38 yrs · 173 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLWWWLW
Buse I.
6-2 1-6 6-3
Dutra Da Silva D.
Buse I.
6162
Dutra Da Silva D.
2631

Ignacio Buse defeated Daniel Dutra Da Silva 6-2 1-6 6-3 in the Lima CH round of 32 on clay. The result followed the form book — Ignacio Buse came in ranked #33.

Key context

  • Match story: Ignacio Buse closed it out in three sets, 6–2 1–6 6–3.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Buse I.serving66% hold

wins 56% of points on serve vs Dutra Da Silva D.

Dutra Da Silva D.serving56% hold

wins 52% of points on serve vs Buse I.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on clay

Buse I.Dutra Da Silva D.
41
Serve
—
8
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the clay field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Buse I.Dutra Da Silva D.
1st serve in·Slight edge
62%
57%
1st serve points won·Even
68%
66%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
48%
Service points won·Even
61%
58%
Return points won·Even
42%
41%
Break points saved·Slight edge
59%
54%
Aces / match·Even
3.2
3.1
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.2
3.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (168 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Buse I.Dutra Da Silva D.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
63
0
Break points saved·Dominant
87
14
Break points won·Slight edge
28
23
Deciding sets·Dominant
80
0
Tiebreaks·Dominant
93
5

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Buse I.
5.6
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 77 days (−1.2)
Dutra Da Silva D.
4.1
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
9.6+504 Clay Elo edge
Surface ELO
0.4Clay Elo 1282
9.8Overall Elo 1822
ELO gap
0.2Overall Elo 1307
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
Surface form
2.1
Win streak
0.0Lost last 3
Fatigue & Travel
Minutes 14d
7.6
3-set count
7.0
Prev. match
6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Buse I.Dutra Da Silva D.
Freshness·Even
98
100

Buse I.: 13 days rest · 1 match (14d) · Dutra Da Silva D.: 21 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Ugo Carabelli C.[3]
Tirante T.[7]
6-27-64
Altmaier D.[4]
Etcheverry T.[2]
6-16-746-4
Semi-finals
Ugo Carabelli C.[3]
Etcheverry T.[1]
6-33-67-5
Tirante T.[7]
Bueno G.
7-654-67-5
Etcheverry T.[2]
Burruchaga R.
6-23-66-3
Altmaier D.[4]
Coria F.[1]
6-36-3
Quarter-finals
Tirante T.[7]
Varillas J.[2]
6-46-3
Bueno G.
Elias G.[8]
2-67-626-0
Ugo Carabelli C.[3]
Mena F.[5]
7-646-1
Etcheverry T.[1]
Olivo R.[6]
7-656-727-5
Coria F.[1]
Mpetshi Perricard G.
7-647-65
Etcheverry T.[2]
Meligeni Alves F.
7-56-2
Altmaier D.[4]
Rodriguez Taverna S.
3-67-56-2
Burruchaga R.
Milojevic N.
7-632-66-4
R16
Tirante T.[7]
Chappell N.
6-46-0
Mena F.[5]
Huertas Del Pino A.
6-36-2
Varillas J.[2]
Otegui J.
6-16-2
Bueno G.
Burruchaga R.
7-57-5
Etcheverry T.[1]
Quiroz R.
6-26-3
Elias G.[8]
Buse I.
7-656-1
Ugo Carabelli C.[3]
Hoyos Franco A.
6-16-1
Olivo R.[6]
Panta Herreros J.
6-16-4
Altmaier D.[4]
Agamenone F.
7-53-66-3
Burruchaga R.
Tirante T.
3-66-26-4
Coria F.[1]
Buse I.
6-44-66-2
Rodriguez Taverna S.
Skatov T.[8]
6-26-2
Meligeni Alves F.
Melzer G.
6-36-1
Milojevic N.
Cecchinato M.[3]
2-66-46-4
Etcheverry T.[2]
Olivieri G.
6-34-66-1
Mpetshi Perricard G.
Ugo Carabelli C.[6]
7-57-5
R32
Otegui J.
Carou I.
6-36-746-1
Varillas J.[2]
Boscardin Dias P.
6-36-2
Chappell N.
Kypson P.
7-57-5
Bueno G.
Ficovich J.[4]
7-56-3
Mena F.[5]
Farjat T.
7-56-0
Hoyos Franco A.
Ballotta G.
7-646-4
Ugo Carabelli C.[3]
Mejia N.
6-26-3
Olivo R.[6]
Dutra Da Silva D.
3-66-37-63
Quiroz R.
Luz O.
3-66-46-2
Etcheverry T.[1]
Gomez J.
6-26-3
Huertas Del Pino A.
Krstin P.
7-644-66-1
Panta Herreros J.
Alvarez N.
6-27-5
Buse I.
Ribeiro E.
6-06-2
Elias G.[8]
Juarez F.
7-623-67-5
Tirante T.[7]
Huertas Del Pino C.
6-36-2
Burruchaga R.
Villanueva G.
6-26-3
Melzer G.
Varillas J.[5]
6-36-4
Etcheverry T.[2]
Choinski J.
6-46-2
Meligeni Alves F.
Comesana F.
6-26-0
Altmaier D.[4]
Kicker N.
5-77-56-4
Buse I.
Dutra Da Silva D.
6-21-66-3
Coria F.[1]
Houkes M.
6-36-3
Tirante T.
Zekic M.
6-46-4
Rodriguez Taverna S.
Casanova H.
6-36-4
Milojevic N.
Alvarez N.
6-35-76-1
Olivieri G.
Seyboth Wild T.
6-17-61
Agamenone F.
Collarini A.
6-46-2
Skatov T.[8]
Bueno G.
6-46-1
Mpetshi Perricard G.
Olivo R.
4-66-36-2
Cecchinato M.[3]
De Jong J.
6-37-66
Ugo Carabelli C.[6]
Navone M.
6-26-3
Burruchaga R.
Reis Da Silva J.
6-767-626-3