Federico Coria vs Ignacio Buse — Lima CH Round of 16

Lima CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
Federico Coria
ARG1
Federico Coria
#783ATP
1537ELO
1515Clay ELO
34 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLWLLWWL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 24 October 2022
clay
Ignacio Buse
PER
Ignacio Buse
#33ATP
1822ELO
1786Clay ELO
$949kYTD
$1.4MCAREER
22 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLWLWWW
Coria F.
6-4 4-6 6-2
Buse I.
Coria F.
6462
Buse I.
4621

Federico Coria defeated Ignacio Buse 6-4 4-6 6-2 in the Lima CH round of 16 on clay. The upset overturned the form book — Ignacio Buse came in ranked #33.

Key context

  • Match story: Federico Coria closed it out in three sets, 6–4 4–6 6–2.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Coria F.serving59% hold

wins 53% of points on serve vs Buse I.

Buse I.serving61% hold

wins 54% of points on serve vs Coria F.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on clay

Coria F.Buse I.
—
Serve
41
—
Return
14

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the clay field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Coria F.Buse I.
1st serve in·Even
67%
63%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
63%
68%
2nd serve points won·Even
48%
50%
Service points won·Even
58%
61%
Return points won·Even
43%
41%
Break points saved·Even
55%
59%
Aces / match·Slight edge
2.3
3.2
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.7
2.2

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (199 vs 168). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Coria F.Buse I.
Clutch Rating·Even
67
63
Break points saved·Clear edge
71
87
Break points won·Dominant
72
28
Deciding sets·Even
78
80
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
76
93

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Coria F.
5.8
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Buse I.
4.9
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 77 days (−1.2)
Form & Matchup
3.1Clay Elo 1515
Surface ELO
6.9+271 Clay Elo edge
3.0Overall Elo 1537
ELO gap
7.0Overall Elo 1822
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
6.0
Surface form
Fatigue & Travel
0.7
Minutes 14d
0.0
3-set count
7.0
Prev. match
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Coria F.Buse I.
Freshness·Clear edge
80
98

Coria F.: 2 days rest · 3 matches, 53 games (7d) · Buse I.: 13 days rest · 1 match (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Ugo Carabelli C.[3]
Tirante T.[7]
6-27-64
Altmaier D.[4]
Etcheverry T.[2]
6-16-746-4
Semi-finals
Ugo Carabelli C.[3]
Etcheverry T.[1]
6-33-67-5
Tirante T.[7]
Bueno G.
7-654-67-5
Etcheverry T.[2]
Burruchaga R.
6-23-66-3
Altmaier D.[4]
Coria F.[1]
6-36-3
Quarter-finals
Tirante T.[7]
Varillas J.[2]
6-46-3
Bueno G.
Elias G.[8]
2-67-626-0
Ugo Carabelli C.[3]
Mena F.[5]
7-646-1
Etcheverry T.[1]
Olivo R.[6]
7-656-727-5
Coria F.[1]
Mpetshi Perricard G.
7-647-65
Etcheverry T.[2]
Meligeni Alves F.
7-56-2
Altmaier D.[4]
Rodriguez Taverna S.
3-67-56-2
Burruchaga R.
Milojevic N.
7-632-66-4
R16
Tirante T.[7]
Chappell N.
6-46-0
Mena F.[5]
Huertas Del Pino A.
6-36-2
Varillas J.[2]
Otegui J.
6-16-2
Bueno G.
Burruchaga R.
7-57-5
Etcheverry T.[1]
Quiroz R.
6-26-3
Elias G.[8]
Buse I.
7-656-1
Ugo Carabelli C.[3]
Hoyos Franco A.
6-16-1
Olivo R.[6]
Panta Herreros J.
6-16-4
Altmaier D.[4]
Agamenone F.
7-53-66-3
Burruchaga R.
Tirante T.
3-66-26-4
Coria F.[1]
Buse I.
6-44-66-2
Rodriguez Taverna S.
Skatov T.[8]
6-26-2
Meligeni Alves F.
Melzer G.
6-36-1
Milojevic N.
Cecchinato M.[3]
2-66-46-4
Etcheverry T.[2]
Olivieri G.
6-34-66-1
Mpetshi Perricard G.
Ugo Carabelli C.[6]
7-57-5
R32
Otegui J.
Carou I.
6-36-746-1
Varillas J.[2]
Boscardin Dias P.
6-36-2
Chappell N.
Kypson P.
7-57-5
Bueno G.
Ficovich J.[4]
7-56-3
Mena F.[5]
Farjat T.
7-56-0
Hoyos Franco A.
Ballotta G.
7-646-4
Ugo Carabelli C.[3]
Mejia N.
6-26-3
Olivo R.[6]
Dutra Da Silva D.
3-66-37-63
Quiroz R.
Luz O.
3-66-46-2
Etcheverry T.[1]
Gomez J.
6-26-3
Huertas Del Pino A.
Krstin P.
7-644-66-1
Panta Herreros J.
Alvarez N.
6-27-5
Buse I.
Ribeiro E.
6-06-2
Elias G.[8]
Juarez F.
7-623-67-5
Tirante T.[7]
Huertas Del Pino C.
6-36-2
Burruchaga R.
Villanueva G.
6-26-3
Melzer G.
Varillas J.[5]
6-36-4
Etcheverry T.[2]
Choinski J.
6-46-2
Meligeni Alves F.
Comesana F.
6-26-0
Altmaier D.[4]
Kicker N.
5-77-56-4
Buse I.
Dutra Da Silva D.
6-21-66-3
Coria F.[1]
Houkes M.
6-36-3
Tirante T.
Zekic M.
6-46-4
Rodriguez Taverna S.
Casanova H.
6-36-4
Milojevic N.
Alvarez N.
6-35-76-1
Olivieri G.
Seyboth Wild T.
6-17-61
Agamenone F.
Collarini A.
6-46-2
Skatov T.[8]
Bueno G.
6-46-1
Mpetshi Perricard G.
Olivo R.
4-66-36-2
Cecchinato M.[3]
De Jong J.
6-37-66
Ugo Carabelli C.[6]
Navone M.
6-26-3
Burruchaga R.
Reis Da Silva J.
6-767-626-3