Tomas Martin Etcheverry vs Felipe Meligeni Alves — Lima CH Quarter-final

Lima CH · CHALLENGER · Quarter-final
Tomas Martin Etcheverry
ARG2
Tomas Martin Etcheverry
#30ATP
1812ELO
1767Clay ELO
$1.4MYTD
$6.8MCAREER
26 yrs · 196 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLWLLWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 24 October 2022
clay
BRA
Felipe Meligeni Alves
#711ATP
1477ELO
1469Clay ELO
28 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWLWWWWL
Etcheverry T.
7-5 6-2
Meligeni Alves F.
Etcheverry T.
762
Meligeni Alves F.
520

Tomas Martin Etcheverry defeated Felipe Meligeni Alves 7-5 6-2 in the Lima CH quarter-final on clay. The result followed the form book — Tomas Martin Etcheverry came in ranked #30.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Etcheverry T.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Meligeni Alves F.

Meligeni Alves F.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Etcheverry T.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on clay

Etcheverry T.Meligeni Alves F.
56
Serve
—
26
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the clay field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Etcheverry T.Meligeni Alves F.
1st serve in·Even
65%
67%
1st serve points won·Even
72%
69%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
50%
Service points won·Even
65%
63%
Return points won·Even
37%
38%
Break points saved·Even
64%
63%
Aces / match·Clear edge
6.4
3.5
Double faults / match·Even
1.6
1.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Etcheverry T.Meligeni Alves F.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
70
48
Break points saved·Slight edge
98
90
Break points won·Clear edge
36
18
Deciding sets·Dominant
83
47
Tiebreaks·Even
87
88

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Etcheverry T.
7.5
Dominant favouriteUmpiry Score
Meligeni Alves F.
3.9
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
9.3+299 Clay Elo edge
Surface ELO
0.7Clay Elo 1469
9.8Overall Elo 1812
ELO gap
0.2Overall Elo 1477
10.0No prior meetings
H2H
0.0
6.1
Surface form
2.3
Win streak
0.0Lost last 6
Fatigue & Travel
6.8
Minutes 14d
8.4
7.0
3-set count
7.0
7.0
Prev. match
6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Etcheverry T.Meligeni Alves F.
Freshness·Dominant
96
71

Etcheverry T.: 14 days rest · 1 match (14d) · Meligeni Alves F.: 6 days rest · 2 matches, 52 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Ugo Carabelli C.[3]
Tirante T.[7]
6-27-64
Altmaier D.[4]
Etcheverry T.[2]
6-16-746-4
Semi-finals
Ugo Carabelli C.[3]
Etcheverry T.[1]
6-33-67-5
Tirante T.[7]
Bueno G.
7-654-67-5
Etcheverry T.[2]
Burruchaga R.
6-23-66-3
Altmaier D.[4]
Coria F.[1]
6-36-3
Quarter-finals
Tirante T.[7]
Varillas J.[2]
6-46-3
Bueno G.
Elias G.[8]
2-67-626-0
Ugo Carabelli C.[3]
Mena F.[5]
7-646-1
Etcheverry T.[1]
Olivo R.[6]
7-656-727-5
Coria F.[1]
Mpetshi Perricard G.
7-647-65
Etcheverry T.[2]
Meligeni Alves F.
7-56-2
Altmaier D.[4]
Rodriguez Taverna S.
3-67-56-2
Burruchaga R.
Milojevic N.
7-632-66-4
R16
Tirante T.[7]
Chappell N.
6-46-0
Mena F.[5]
Huertas Del Pino A.
6-36-2
Varillas J.[2]
Otegui J.
6-16-2
Bueno G.
Burruchaga R.
7-57-5
Etcheverry T.[1]
Quiroz R.
6-26-3
Elias G.[8]
Buse I.
7-656-1
Ugo Carabelli C.[3]
Hoyos Franco A.
6-16-1
Olivo R.[6]
Panta Herreros J.
6-16-4
Altmaier D.[4]
Agamenone F.
7-53-66-3
Burruchaga R.
Tirante T.
3-66-26-4
Coria F.[1]
Buse I.
6-44-66-2
Rodriguez Taverna S.
Skatov T.[8]
6-26-2
Meligeni Alves F.
Melzer G.
6-36-1
Milojevic N.
Cecchinato M.[3]
2-66-46-4
Etcheverry T.[2]
Olivieri G.
6-34-66-1
Mpetshi Perricard G.
Ugo Carabelli C.[6]
7-57-5
R32
Otegui J.
Carou I.
6-36-746-1
Varillas J.[2]
Boscardin Dias P.
6-36-2
Chappell N.
Kypson P.
7-57-5
Bueno G.
Ficovich J.[4]
7-56-3
Mena F.[5]
Farjat T.
7-56-0
Hoyos Franco A.
Ballotta G.
7-646-4
Ugo Carabelli C.[3]
Mejia N.
6-26-3
Olivo R.[6]
Dutra Da Silva D.
3-66-37-63
Quiroz R.
Luz O.
3-66-46-2
Etcheverry T.[1]
Gomez J.
6-26-3
Huertas Del Pino A.
Krstin P.
7-644-66-1
Panta Herreros J.
Alvarez N.
6-27-5
Buse I.
Ribeiro E.
6-06-2
Elias G.[8]
Juarez F.
7-623-67-5
Tirante T.[7]
Huertas Del Pino C.
6-36-2
Burruchaga R.
Villanueva G.
6-26-3
Melzer G.
Varillas J.[5]
6-36-4
Etcheverry T.[2]
Choinski J.
6-46-2
Meligeni Alves F.
Comesana F.
6-26-0
Altmaier D.[4]
Kicker N.
5-77-56-4
Buse I.
Dutra Da Silva D.
6-21-66-3
Coria F.[1]
Houkes M.
6-36-3
Tirante T.
Zekic M.
6-46-4
Rodriguez Taverna S.
Casanova H.
6-36-4
Milojevic N.
Alvarez N.
6-35-76-1
Olivieri G.
Seyboth Wild T.
6-17-61
Agamenone F.
Collarini A.
6-46-2
Skatov T.[8]
Bueno G.
6-46-1
Mpetshi Perricard G.
Olivo R.
4-66-36-2
Cecchinato M.[3]
De Jong J.
6-37-66
Ugo Carabelli C.[6]
Navone M.
6-26-3
Burruchaga R.
Reis Da Silva J.
6-767-626-3