Cem Ilkel vs Mate Valkusz — Vilnius CH Round of 16

Vilnius CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
Cem Ilkel
TUR
Cem Ilkel
#1462ATP
30 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLLLLWL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 17 October 2022
hard
HUN
Mate Valkusz
#765ATP
27 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLWLLLL
Ilkel C.
7-6 6-7 6-1
Valkusz M.
Ilkel C.
776262
Valkusz M.
617711

Cem Ilkel defeated Mate Valkusz 7-6 6-7 6-1 in the Vilnius CH round of 16 on hard.

Key context

  • Match story: Cem Ilkel came through a tight passage before pulling clear — 7–6 6–7 6–1.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Ilkel C.serving70% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Valkusz M.

Valkusz M.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Ilkel C.

Serve advantage — Valkusz M.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Ilkel C.Valkusz M.
1st serve in·Slight edge
58%
63%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
72%
65%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
50%
Service points won·Even
62%
60%
Return points won·Slight edge
37%
43%
Break points saved·Even
56%
59%
Aces / match·Clear edge
5.0
2.2
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.4
3.1

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (123 vs 101). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Ilkel C.Valkusz M.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
32
46
Break points saved·Even
49
50
Break points won·Dominant
3
62
Deciding sets·Clear edge
70
50
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
66
82

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Ilkel C.
5.9
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Valkusz M.
4.6
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Recent retirement (−1.5)
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
4.8
Surface form
3.5
0.0Lost last 2
Win streak
7.03-match win streak
Fatigue & Travel
8.5
Minutes 14d
4.4
7.0
3-set count
4.0
7.0
Prev. match
8.0
Surface transition
6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Bellucci M.
Ilkel C.
1-66-37-5
Semi-finals
Ilkel C.
Added D.
7-636-4
Bellucci M.
Durasovic V.
6-46-4
Quarter-finals
Added D.
Klein L.[5]
7-56-3
Durasovic V.
Escoffier A.[8]
6-16-1
Bellucci M.
Kolar Z.
6-16-3
Ilkel C.
Lokoli L.[7]
7-56-3
R16
Kolar Z.
Mager G.[4]
7-686-4
Bellucci M.
Fatic N.[6]
7-656-3
Durasovic V.
Marchenko I.
5-77-646-1
Ilkel C.
Valkusz M.
7-616-726-1
Lokoli L.[7]
Lajal M.
1-66-36-0
Added D.
Berankis R.[2]
7-57-65
Escoffier A.[8]
Butvilas E.
6-07-66
Klein L.[5]
Travaglia S.
6-07-5
R32
Klein L.[5]
Gray A.
6-33-67-63
Ilkel C.
Arnaldi M.[3]
6-36-2
Valkusz M.
Gulbis E.
6-26-3
Lokoli L.[7]
Ramanathan R.
6-16-4
Mager G.[4]
Janvier M.
6-756-36-4
Butvilas E.
Nikles J.
3-67-656-1
Durasovic V.
Machac T.[1]
6-37-65
Fatic N.[6]
Decamps G.
6-47-5
Bellucci M.
Marie J.
6-47-60
Kolar Z.
Poljak D.
6-766-27-5
Added D.
Rosenkranz M.
6-46-4
Lajal M.
Atmane T.
7-666-1
Travaglia S.
Serdarusic N.
6-37-63
Berankis R.[2]
Sabaliauskas A.
6-46-2
Escoffier A.[8]
Gaubas V.
6-16-3
Marchenko I.
Basic M.
7-56-2