Cem Ilkel vs Laurent Lokoli — Vilnius CH Quarter-final

Vilnius CH · CHALLENGER · Quarter-final
Cem Ilkel
TUR
Cem Ilkel
#1462ATP
30 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLLLLWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 17 October 2022
hard
Laurent Lokoli
FRA7
Laurent Lokoli
#449ATP
1455ELO
1407Hard ELO
31 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLWWLLLW
Ilkel C.
7-5 6-3
Lokoli L.
Ilkel C.
762
Lokoli L.
530

Cem Ilkel defeated Laurent Lokoli 7-5 6-3 in the Vilnius CH quarter-final on hard.

Key context

  • Match story: Cem Ilkel closed it out in two sets, 7–5 6–3.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Ilkel C.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Lokoli L.

Lokoli L.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Ilkel C.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Ilkel C.Lokoli L.
1st serve in·Even
58%
62%
1st serve points won·Even
72%
69%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
47%
Service points won·Even
62%
61%
Return points won·Even
37%
40%
Break points saved·Slight edge
56%
62%
Aces / match·Slight edge
5.0
4.2
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.5
3.6

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (123 vs 156). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Ilkel C.Lokoli L.
Clutch Rating·Even
32
30
Break points saved·Dominant
49
84
Break points won·Clear edge
3
16
Deciding sets·Dominant
70
35
Tiebreaks·Dominant
66
37

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Ilkel C.
5.9
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Lokoli L.
6.2
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
4.8
Surface form
4.7
0.0Lost last 2
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
8.5
Minutes 14d
9.3
7.0
3-set count
7.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Bellucci M.
Ilkel C.
1-66-37-5
Semi-finals
Ilkel C.
Added D.
7-636-4
Bellucci M.
Durasovic V.
6-46-4
Quarter-finals
Added D.
Klein L.[5]
7-56-3
Durasovic V.
Escoffier A.[8]
6-16-1
Bellucci M.
Kolar Z.
6-16-3
Ilkel C.
Lokoli L.[7]
7-56-3
R16
Kolar Z.
Mager G.[4]
7-686-4
Bellucci M.
Fatic N.[6]
7-656-3
Durasovic V.
Marchenko I.
5-77-646-1
Ilkel C.
Valkusz M.
7-616-726-1
Lokoli L.[7]
Lajal M.
1-66-36-0
Added D.
Berankis R.[2]
7-57-65
Escoffier A.[8]
Butvilas E.
6-07-66
Klein L.[5]
Travaglia S.
6-07-5
R32
Klein L.[5]
Gray A.
6-33-67-63
Ilkel C.
Arnaldi M.[3]
6-36-2
Valkusz M.
Gulbis E.
6-26-3
Lokoli L.[7]
Ramanathan R.
6-16-4
Mager G.[4]
Janvier M.
6-756-36-4
Butvilas E.
Nikles J.
3-67-656-1
Durasovic V.
Machac T.[1]
6-37-65
Fatic N.[6]
Decamps G.
6-47-5
Bellucci M.
Marie J.
6-47-60
Kolar Z.
Poljak D.
6-766-27-5
Added D.
Rosenkranz M.
6-46-4
Lajal M.
Atmane T.
7-666-1
Travaglia S.
Serdarusic N.
6-37-63
Berankis R.[2]
Sabaliauskas A.
6-46-2
Escoffier A.[8]
Gaubas V.
6-16-3
Marchenko I.
Basic M.
7-56-2