Hazem Naw vs Elmar Ejupovic — Hamburg CH Qualifying Round 1

Hamburg CH · CHALLENGER · Qualifying Round 1
SYR
Hazem Naw
#996ATP
26 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLLLWLWL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 17 October 2022
hard
GER1
Elmar Ejupovic
#752ATP
33 yrs · 193 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLWWLLW
Naw H.
6-4 3-6 6-3
Ejupovic E.
Naw H.
6362
Ejupovic E.
4631

Hazem Naw defeated Elmar Ejupovic 6-4 3-6 6-3 in the Hamburg CH qualifying round 1 on hard.

Key context

  • Match story: Hazem Naw closed it out in three sets, 6–4 3–6 6–3.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Naw H.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Ejupovic E.

Ejupovic E.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Naw H.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Naw H.Ejupovic E.
1st serve in·Even
63%
63%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
67%
74%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
46%
51%
Service points won·Slight edge
59%
66%
Return points won·Slight edge
40%
34%
Break points saved·Slight edge
59%
66%
Aces / match·Dominant
2.4
7.8
Double faults / match·Slight edge
3.9
3.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (61 vs 134). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Naw H.
3.9
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 105 days (−1.5)
Ejupovic E.
6.7
Slight advantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
Surface form
7.2
0.0
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
Minutes 14d
4.5
3-set count
0.0
Prev. match
9.0
6.0
Surface transition
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Q2
Donskoy E.[10]
Lamasine T.
6-46-4
Kirkin E.[6]
Sperle J.
6-756-36-2
Martineau M.[11]
Vrbensky M.[3]
6-766-36-4
Paulson A.[5]
Kym J.[8]
3-66-36-4
Lenz J.[9]
Naw H.
6-17-5
Jahn J.
Wehnelt K.
7-657-65
Q1
Martineau M.[11]
Stevenson K.
6-36-3
Vrbensky M.[3]
Schell N.
7-626-4
Kym J.[8]
Larwig N.
6-06-2
Paulson A.[5]
Florig P.
6-26-2
Lenz J.[9]
Haliak M.
7-656-3
Naw H.
Ejupovic E.[1]
6-43-66-3
Sperle J.
Krumich M.[7]
3-67-666-4
Kirkin E.[6]
Sandkaulen T.
2-67-56-2
Jahn J.
Reymond A.[12]
7-636-4
Wehnelt K.
Gutierrez O.[4]
3-66-36-3
Donskoy E.[10]
Gavrielides L.
6-27-5
Lamasine T.
De Schepper K.[2]
6-23-67-610