Federico Coria vs Mariano Navone — Coquimbo CH Round of 16

Coquimbo CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
Federico Coria
ARG1
Federico Coria
#783ATP
1537ELO
1515Clay ELO
34 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLWLLWWL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 17 October 2022
clay
Mariano Navone
ARG
Mariano Navone
#48ATP
1822ELO
1800Clay ELO
$722kYTD
$3.1MCAREER
25 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLWWWWL
Coria F.
5-7 6-2 6-1
Navone M.
Coria F.
5662
Navone M.
7211

Federico Coria defeated Mariano Navone 5-7 6-2 6-1 in the Coquimbo CH round of 16 on clay. The upset overturned the form book — Mariano Navone came in ranked #48, leading the head-to-head 1–0. Federico Coria claimed a first win over Mariano Navone in two meetings, narrowing the head-to-head to 1–1.

Key context

Head to head

0–1
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2024-02-19Rio de JaneiroR32clayMariano Navone1-6 6-4 6-2

Serve vs return

This season
Coria F.serving54% hold

wins 51% of points on serve vs Navone M.

Navone M.serving56% hold

wins 52% of points on serve vs Coria F.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on clay

Coria F.Navone M.
—
Serve
0
—
Return
100

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the clay field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Coria F.Navone M.
1st serve in·Even
68%
67%
1st serve points won·Even
63%
64%
2nd serve points won·Even
48%
50%
Service points won·Even
58%
59%
Return points won·Even
43%
43%
Break points saved·Even
55%
55%
Aces / match·Even
2.3
1.7
Double faults / match·Even
2.7
2.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (199 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Coria F.Navone M.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
67
75
Break points saved·Clear edge
71
86
Break points won·Clear edge
72
90
Deciding sets·Even
78
77
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
76
60

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Coria F.
5.4
Clear underdogUmpiry Score
Navone M.
7.4
Dominant favouriteUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
2.3Clay Elo 1515
Surface ELO
7.7+285 Clay Elo edge
2.4Overall Elo 1537
ELO gap
7.6Overall Elo 1822
5.0
H2H
5.0
5.3
Surface form
7.2
0.0
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
5.4
Minutes 14d
6.2
0.0
3-set count
4.0
6.0
Prev. match
7.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Coria F.Navone M.
Freshness·Clear edge
80
96

Coria F.: 2 days rest · 3 matches, 53 games (7d) · Navone M.: 13 days rest · 1 match (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Diaz Acosta F.
Boscardin Dias P.
7-57-64
Cerundolo J.[7]
Diaz Acosta F.
6-33-66-4
Semi-finals
Boscardin Dias P.
Torres J.
7-636-3
Diaz Acosta F.
Comesana F.
6-16-4
Cerundolo J.[7]
Agamenone F.[8]
6-26-2
Diaz Acosta F.
Skatov T.[6]
6-26-1
Quarter-finals
Torres J.
Collarini A.[3]
0-66-46-0
Comesana F.
Martin Tiffon P.
7-636-1
Boscardin Dias P.
Huertas Del Pino A.
1-66-46-4
Diaz Acosta F.
Barrios Vera T.[1]
6-46-3
Agamenone F.[8]
Collarini A.
4-67-56-1
Diaz Acosta F.
Cecchinato M.[4]
6-36-3
Cerundolo J.[7]
Etcheverry T.[2]
4-66-36-4
Skatov T.[6]
Coria F.[1]
6-33-66-4
R16
Huertas Del Pino A.
Rodriguez Taverna S.[2]
7-656-4
Martin Tiffon P.
Lama G.[5]
6-16-3
Boscardin Dias P.
Heide G.
7-616-4
Collarini A.[3]
Andreev A.
6-46-2
Torres J.
Reis Da Silva J.
6-34-66-2
Diaz Acosta F.
Casanova H.
7-616-0
Comesana F.
Olivieri G.[4]
6-36-4
Barrios Vera T.[1]
Huertas Del Pino C.
6-46-1
Collarini A.
Nagal S.
6-26-1
Agamenone F.[8]
Paul J.
6-46-3
Diaz Acosta F.
Ugo Carabelli C.[5]
6-36-1
Skatov T.[6]
Kicker N.
6-41-66-4
Coria F.[1]
Navone M.
5-76-26-1
Cerundolo J.[7]
Soto M.
6-16-4
Cecchinato M.[4]
Bertola R.
6-16-3
Etcheverry T.[2]
Vidal Azorin J.
6-36-1
R32
Lama G.[5]
Villanueva G.
6-44-66-2
Huertas Del Pino C.
Villalon N.
6-26-2
Diaz Acosta F.
Soares Klier Junior G.
6-26-2
Rodriguez Taverna S.[2]
Franco Descotte M.
6-36-706-1
Boscardin Dias P.
Leite W.
6-36-0
Heide G.
Dutra Da Silva D.[6]
6-47-64
Andreev A.
Lingua Lavallen A.
6-26-4
Reis Da Silva J.
Quiroz R.
6-46-4
Martin Tiffon P.
Rodriguez C.
7-56-4
Comesana F.
Dellien Velasco M.
6-36-3
Olivieri G.[4]
Nakagawa N.
6-26-3
Casanova H.
Mejia N.
6-716-16-4
Collarini A.[3]
Zukas M.
7-656-2
Barrios Vera T.[1]
Burruchaga R.
6-22-67-5
Huertas Del Pino A.
Alvarez N.
7-56-2
Torres J.
Luz O.[7]
6-37-65
Etcheverry T.[2]
Fernandez Flores D.
6-36-1
Vidal Azorin J.
Olivo R.
2-66-37-5
Soto M.
Paz J.
6-26-1
Nagal S.
Altmaier D.[3]
6-27-67
Collarini A.
Dutra Da Silva D.
1-66-27-5
Ugo Carabelli C.[5]
Olivieri G.
6-46-1
Diaz Acosta F.
Casanova H.
6-767-626-1
Bertola R.
Burruchaga R.
6-47-5
Skatov T.[6]
Rincon D.
7-56-2
Kicker N.
Comesana F.
6-16-3
Navone M.
Torres J.
3-66-26-2
Coria F.[1]
Giannessi A.
6-46-2
Cecchinato M.[4]
Seyboth Wild T.
6-27-5
Cerundolo J.[7]
Villanueva G.
6-46-3
Paul J.
Vallejo A.
6-26-3
Agamenone F.[8]
Tenti F.
7-56-0