Juan Manuel Cerundolo vs Matias Soto — Coquimbo CH Round of 16

Coquimbo CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
Juan Manuel Cerundolo
ARG7
Juan Manuel Cerundolo
#45ATP
1790ELO
1762Clay ELO
$752kYTD
$2.4MCAREER
24 yrs · 183 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WLLWWLWWWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 17 October 2022
clay
CHI
Matias Soto
#249ATP
1421ELO
1412Clay ELO
27 yrs · 170 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWLWLWL
Cerundolo J.
6-1 6-4
Soto M.
Cerundolo J.
662
Soto M.
140

Juan Manuel Cerundolo defeated Matias Soto 6-1 6-4 in the Coquimbo CH round of 16 on clay. The result followed the form book — Juan Manuel Cerundolo came in ranked #45, leading the head-to-head 2–0. Juan Manuel Cerundolo extended the head-to-head to 3–0.

Key context

Head to head

2–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2025-02-24SantiagoQ1clayJuan Manuel Cerundolo6-3 6-2
2024-02-26SantiagoQ2clayJuan Manuel Cerundolo6-4 6-4

Serve vs return

This season
Cerundolo J.serving70% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Soto M.

Soto M.serving66% hold

wins 56% of points on serve vs Cerundolo J.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on clay

Cerundolo J.Soto M.
15
Serve
—
41
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the clay field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Cerundolo J.Soto M.
1st serve in·Even
60%
57%
1st serve points won·Even
67%
70%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
49%
Service points won·Even
61%
61%
Return points won·Even
41%
39%
Break points saved·Even
57%
58%
Aces / match·Slight edge
3.2
4.2
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.7
3.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (199 vs 132). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Cerundolo J.Soto M.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
85
34
Break points saved·Dominant
82
51
Break points won·Dominant
80
14
Deciding sets·Dominant
98
68
Tiebreaks·Dominant
96
56

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Cerundolo J.
7.6
Dominant favouriteUmpiry Score
Soto M.
3.5
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 371 days (−1.5)
Form & Matchup
7.7+350 Clay Elo edge
Surface ELO
2.3Clay Elo 1412
7.8Overall Elo 1790
ELO gap
2.2Overall Elo 1421
5.0
H2H
5.0
7.9
Surface form
Win streak
0.0Lost last 3
Fatigue & Travel
5.7
Minutes 14d
4.0
3-set count
6.0
Prev. match
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Cerundolo J.Soto M.
Freshness·Dominant
100
56

Cerundolo J.: 15 days rest · Soto M.: 2 days rest · 5 matches, 120 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Diaz Acosta F.
Boscardin Dias P.
7-57-64
Cerundolo J.[7]
Diaz Acosta F.
6-33-66-4
Semi-finals
Boscardin Dias P.
Torres J.
7-636-3
Diaz Acosta F.
Comesana F.
6-16-4
Cerundolo J.[7]
Agamenone F.[8]
6-26-2
Diaz Acosta F.
Skatov T.[6]
6-26-1
Quarter-finals
Torres J.
Collarini A.[3]
0-66-46-0
Comesana F.
Martin Tiffon P.
7-636-1
Boscardin Dias P.
Huertas Del Pino A.
1-66-46-4
Diaz Acosta F.
Barrios Vera T.[1]
6-46-3
Agamenone F.[8]
Collarini A.
4-67-56-1
Diaz Acosta F.
Cecchinato M.[4]
6-36-3
Cerundolo J.[7]
Etcheverry T.[2]
4-66-36-4
Skatov T.[6]
Coria F.[1]
6-33-66-4
R16
Huertas Del Pino A.
Rodriguez Taverna S.[2]
7-656-4
Martin Tiffon P.
Lama G.[5]
6-16-3
Boscardin Dias P.
Heide G.
7-616-4
Collarini A.[3]
Andreev A.
6-46-2
Torres J.
Reis Da Silva J.
6-34-66-2
Diaz Acosta F.
Casanova H.
7-616-0
Comesana F.
Olivieri G.[4]
6-36-4
Barrios Vera T.[1]
Huertas Del Pino C.
6-46-1
Collarini A.
Nagal S.
6-26-1
Agamenone F.[8]
Paul J.
6-46-3
Diaz Acosta F.
Ugo Carabelli C.[5]
6-36-1
Skatov T.[6]
Kicker N.
6-41-66-4
Coria F.[1]
Navone M.
5-76-26-1
Cerundolo J.[7]
Soto M.
6-16-4
Cecchinato M.[4]
Bertola R.
6-16-3
Etcheverry T.[2]
Vidal Azorin J.
6-36-1
R32
Lama G.[5]
Villanueva G.
6-44-66-2
Huertas Del Pino C.
Villalon N.
6-26-2
Diaz Acosta F.
Soares Klier Junior G.
6-26-2
Rodriguez Taverna S.[2]
Franco Descotte M.
6-36-706-1
Boscardin Dias P.
Leite W.
6-36-0
Heide G.
Dutra Da Silva D.[6]
6-47-64
Andreev A.
Lingua Lavallen A.
6-26-4
Reis Da Silva J.
Quiroz R.
6-46-4
Martin Tiffon P.
Rodriguez C.
7-56-4
Comesana F.
Dellien Velasco M.
6-36-3
Olivieri G.[4]
Nakagawa N.
6-26-3
Casanova H.
Mejia N.
6-716-16-4
Collarini A.[3]
Zukas M.
7-656-2
Barrios Vera T.[1]
Burruchaga R.
6-22-67-5
Huertas Del Pino A.
Alvarez N.
7-56-2
Torres J.
Luz O.[7]
6-37-65
Etcheverry T.[2]
Fernandez Flores D.
6-36-1
Vidal Azorin J.
Olivo R.
2-66-37-5
Soto M.
Paz J.
6-26-1
Nagal S.
Altmaier D.[3]
6-27-67
Collarini A.
Dutra Da Silva D.
1-66-27-5
Ugo Carabelli C.[5]
Olivieri G.
6-46-1
Diaz Acosta F.
Casanova H.
6-767-626-1
Bertola R.
Burruchaga R.
6-47-5
Skatov T.[6]
Rincon D.
7-56-2
Kicker N.
Comesana F.
6-16-3
Navone M.
Torres J.
3-66-26-2
Coria F.[1]
Giannessi A.
6-46-2
Cecchinato M.[4]
Seyboth Wild T.
6-27-5
Cerundolo J.[7]
Villanueva G.
6-46-3
Paul J.
Vallejo A.
6-26-3
Agamenone F.[8]
Tenti F.
7-56-0