Jakub Paul vs Ignacio Carou — Coquimbo CH Qualifying Round 2

Coquimbo CH · CHALLENGER · Qualifying Round 2
SUI4
Jakub Paul
#543ATP
1389ELO
1348Clay ELO
27 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLWWLLWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 17 October 2022
clay
URU7
Ignacio Carou
#2047ATP
27 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLLLL
Paul J.
6-1 6-2
Carou I.
Paul J.
662
Carou I.
120

Jakub Paul defeated Ignacio Carou 6-1 6-2 in the Coquimbo CH qualifying round 2 on clay.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Paul J.serving66% hold

wins 56% of points on serve vs Carou I.

Carou I.serving44% hold

wins 48% of points on serve vs Paul J.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Paul J.Carou I.
1st serve in·Even
64%
61%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
65%
60%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
50%
41%
Service points won·Slight edge
59%
52%
Return points won·Even
41%
39%
Break points saved·Slight edge
59%
53%
Aces / match·Even
1.8
1.3
Double faults / match·Dominant
1.6
4.4

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (137 vs 61). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Paul J.
6.4
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Carou I.
4.1
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 31 days (−0.7)
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
5.4
Surface form
1.9
Win streak
0.0Lost last 2
Fatigue & Travel
5.9
Minutes 14d
9.0
Prev. match
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Q2
Huertas Del Pino A.[9]
Nunez V.
6-23-66-3
Huertas Del Pino C.[4]
Panta Herreros J.[8]
6-26-3
Leite W.[5]
Ribeiro E.
6-26-3
Reis Da Silva J.[3]
Otegui J.[12]
4-66-47-5
Nakagawa N.[2]
Galarza J.[11]
7-656-3
Dellien Velasco M.[1]
Martinez M.[10]
6-36-756-3
Rincon D.[2]
Galarza J.[10]
6-746-06-1
Vidal Azorin J.[3]
Gagliardo L.[12]
2-66-06-3
Bertola R.[1]
Lipovsek Puches T.[9]
6-06-0
Tenti F.[6]
Cigarran T.
6-14-66-2
Nagal S.[8]
Martinez M.[5]
6-16-2
Paul J.[4]
Carou I.[7]
6-16-2
Q1
Nakagawa N.[2]
Santibanez S.
6-06-3
Huertas Del Pino A.[9]
Achondo G.
6-06-1
Martinez M.[10]
Castro C.
6-26-1
Ribeiro E.
Carou I.[7]
6-46-3
Nunez V.
Lipovsek Puches T.[6]
2-66-46-1
Leite W.[5]
Loureiro J.
6-16-4
Panta Herreros J.[8]
Franco T.
6-26-766-2
Huertas Del Pino C.[4]
Merino A.
6-46-1
Otegui J.[12]
Hernandez F.
6-26-0
Galarza J.[11]
Nunez D.
7-646-2
Cigarran T.
Nunez D.[11]
7-647-5
Martinez M.[5]
Salazar A.
6-06-0
Vidal Azorin J.[3]
Pereira M.
5-76-16-1
Gagliardo L.[12]
Nunez V.
4-66-44-1
Tenti F.[6]
Matuszewski P.
6-46-2
Nagal S.[8]
Drzewiecki K.
6-36-2
Paul J.[4]
Franco T.
6-36-2
Galarza J.[10]
Merino A.
6-26-2
Rincon D.[2]
Villalon N.
6-46-2