Remy Bertola vs Roman Andres Burruchaga — Coquimbo CH Round of 32

Coquimbo CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Remy Bertola
SUI
Remy Bertola
#179ATP
1579ELO
1484Clay ELO
$107kYTD
$341kCAREER
27 yrs · 175 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLWWWWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 17 October 2022
clay
Roman Andres Burruchaga
ARG
Roman Andres Burruchaga
#67ATP
1711ELO
1694Clay ELO
$446kYTD
$1.2MCAREER
24 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLWLLWLW
Bertola R.
6-4 7-5
Burruchaga R.
Bertola R.
672
Burruchaga R.
450

Remy Bertola defeated Roman Andres Burruchaga 6-4 7-5 in the Coquimbo CH round of 32 on clay. The upset overturned the form book — Roman Andres Burruchaga came in ranked #67, but Remy Bertola had arrived on a 3-match winning run.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Bertola R.serving63% hold

wins 55% of points on serve vs Burruchaga R.

Burruchaga R.serving70% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Bertola R.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Bertola R.Burruchaga R.
1st serve in·Even
58%
61%
1st serve points won·Even
70%
67%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
49%
Service points won·Even
62%
60%
Return points won·Slight edge
38%
43%
Break points saved·Even
59%
58%
Aces / match·Clear edge
3.8
2.2
Double faults / match·Even
3.7
3.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (194 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Bertola R.Burruchaga R.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
30
66
Break points saved·Even
70
68
Break points won·Dominant
12
73
Deciding sets·Dominant
37
84
Tiebreaks·Even
62
64

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Bertola R.
5.6
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Burruchaga R.
7.0
Strong advantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
0.6Clay Elo 1484
Surface ELO
9.4+210 Clay Elo edge
1.6Overall Elo 1579
ELO gap
8.4Overall Elo 1711
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
7.3
Surface form
4.1
7.03-match win streak
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
0.0
Minutes 14d
0.0
3-set count
Prev. match
9.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Bertola R.Burruchaga R.
Freshness·Even
96
94

Bertola R.: 6 days rest · 1 match, 15 games (7d) · Burruchaga R.: 7 days rest · 1 match, 18 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Diaz Acosta F.
Boscardin Dias P.
7-57-64
Cerundolo J.[7]
Diaz Acosta F.
6-33-66-4
Semi-finals
Boscardin Dias P.
Torres J.
7-636-3
Diaz Acosta F.
Comesana F.
6-16-4
Cerundolo J.[7]
Agamenone F.[8]
6-26-2
Diaz Acosta F.
Skatov T.[6]
6-26-1
Quarter-finals
Torres J.
Collarini A.[3]
0-66-46-0
Comesana F.
Martin Tiffon P.
7-636-1
Boscardin Dias P.
Huertas Del Pino A.
1-66-46-4
Diaz Acosta F.
Barrios Vera T.[1]
6-46-3
Agamenone F.[8]
Collarini A.
4-67-56-1
Diaz Acosta F.
Cecchinato M.[4]
6-36-3
Cerundolo J.[7]
Etcheverry T.[2]
4-66-36-4
Skatov T.[6]
Coria F.[1]
6-33-66-4
R16
Huertas Del Pino A.
Rodriguez Taverna S.[2]
7-656-4
Martin Tiffon P.
Lama G.[5]
6-16-3
Boscardin Dias P.
Heide G.
7-616-4
Collarini A.[3]
Andreev A.
6-46-2
Torres J.
Reis Da Silva J.
6-34-66-2
Diaz Acosta F.
Casanova H.
7-616-0
Comesana F.
Olivieri G.[4]
6-36-4
Barrios Vera T.[1]
Huertas Del Pino C.
6-46-1
Collarini A.
Nagal S.
6-26-1
Agamenone F.[8]
Paul J.
6-46-3
Diaz Acosta F.
Ugo Carabelli C.[5]
6-36-1
Skatov T.[6]
Kicker N.
6-41-66-4
Coria F.[1]
Navone M.
5-76-26-1
Cerundolo J.[7]
Soto M.
6-16-4
Cecchinato M.[4]
Bertola R.
6-16-3
Etcheverry T.[2]
Vidal Azorin J.
6-36-1
R32
Lama G.[5]
Villanueva G.
6-44-66-2
Huertas Del Pino C.
Villalon N.
6-26-2
Diaz Acosta F.
Soares Klier Junior G.
6-26-2
Rodriguez Taverna S.[2]
Franco Descotte M.
6-36-706-1
Boscardin Dias P.
Leite W.
6-36-0
Heide G.
Dutra Da Silva D.[6]
6-47-64
Andreev A.
Lingua Lavallen A.
6-26-4
Reis Da Silva J.
Quiroz R.
6-46-4
Martin Tiffon P.
Rodriguez C.
7-56-4
Comesana F.
Dellien Velasco M.
6-36-3
Olivieri G.[4]
Nakagawa N.
6-26-3
Casanova H.
Mejia N.
6-716-16-4
Collarini A.[3]
Zukas M.
7-656-2
Barrios Vera T.[1]
Burruchaga R.
6-22-67-5
Huertas Del Pino A.
Alvarez N.
7-56-2
Torres J.
Luz O.[7]
6-37-65
Etcheverry T.[2]
Fernandez Flores D.
6-36-1
Vidal Azorin J.
Olivo R.
2-66-37-5
Soto M.
Paz J.
6-26-1
Nagal S.
Altmaier D.[3]
6-27-67
Collarini A.
Dutra Da Silva D.
1-66-27-5
Ugo Carabelli C.[5]
Olivieri G.
6-46-1
Diaz Acosta F.
Casanova H.
6-767-626-1
Bertola R.
Burruchaga R.
6-47-5
Skatov T.[6]
Rincon D.
7-56-2
Kicker N.
Comesana F.
6-16-3
Navone M.
Torres J.
3-66-26-2
Coria F.[1]
Giannessi A.
6-46-2
Cecchinato M.[4]
Seyboth Wild T.
6-27-5
Cerundolo J.[7]
Villanueva G.
6-46-3
Paul J.
Vallejo A.
6-26-3
Agamenone F.[8]
Tenti F.
7-56-0