Mark Lajal vs Terence Atmane — Vilnius CH Round of 32

Vilnius CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
EST
Mark Lajal
#159ATP
1589ELO
1556Hard ELO
$97kYTD
$654kCAREER
23 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLWWLWLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 17 October 2022
hard
Terence Atmane
FRA
Terence Atmane
#50ATP
1704ELO
1674Hard ELO
$707kYTD
$2.2MCAREER
24 yrs · 193 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLLLLLL
Lajal M.
7-6 6-1
Atmane T.
Lajal M.
7862
Atmane T.
6610

Mark Lajal defeated Terence Atmane 7-6 6-1 in the Vilnius CH round of 32 on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Terence Atmane came in ranked #50.

Key context

  • Match story: Mark Lajal came through a tight passage before pulling clear — 7–6 6–1.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Lajal M.serving86% hold

wins 67% of points on serve vs Atmane T.

Atmane T.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Lajal M.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Lajal M.Atmane T.
—
Serve
37
—
Return
27

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Lajal M.Atmane T.
1st serve in·Even
62%
60%
1st serve points won·Even
72%
74%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
52%
Service points won·Even
64%
65%
Return points won·Even
39%
36%
Break points saved·Even
62%
64%
Aces / match·Clear edge
5.8
7.5
Double faults / match·Even
3.5
3.7

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (198 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Lajal M.Atmane T.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
43
56
Break points saved·Slight edge
89
95
Break points won·Clear edge
13
25
Deciding sets·Clear edge
42
54
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
81
96

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Lajal M.
4.0
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Injury return: 31 days (−1.0)
Atmane T.
6.9
Slight advantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
3.0Hard Elo 1556
Surface ELO
7.0+117 Hard Elo edge
2.9Overall Elo 1589
ELO gap
7.1Overall Elo 1704
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
Surface form
6.4
0.0Lost last 2
Win streak
0.0Lost last 2
Fatigue & Travel
Minutes 14d
8.0
Prev. match
8.0
6.0
Surface transition
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Lajal M.Atmane T.
Freshness·Slight edge
88
96

Lajal M.: 5 days rest · 1 match, 28 games (7d) · Atmane T.: 13 days rest · 1 match (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Bellucci M.
Ilkel C.
1-66-37-5
Semi-finals
Ilkel C.
Added D.
7-636-4
Bellucci M.
Durasovic V.
6-46-4
Quarter-finals
Added D.
Klein L.[5]
7-56-3
Durasovic V.
Escoffier A.[8]
6-16-1
Bellucci M.
Kolar Z.
6-16-3
Ilkel C.
Lokoli L.[7]
7-56-3
R16
Kolar Z.
Mager G.[4]
7-686-4
Bellucci M.
Fatic N.[6]
7-656-3
Durasovic V.
Marchenko I.
5-77-646-1
Ilkel C.
Valkusz M.
7-616-726-1
Lokoli L.[7]
Lajal M.
1-66-36-0
Added D.
Berankis R.[2]
7-57-65
Escoffier A.[8]
Butvilas E.
6-07-66
Klein L.[5]
Travaglia S.
6-07-5
R32
Klein L.[5]
Gray A.
6-33-67-63
Ilkel C.
Arnaldi M.[3]
6-36-2
Valkusz M.
Gulbis E.
6-26-3
Lokoli L.[7]
Ramanathan R.
6-16-4
Mager G.[4]
Janvier M.
6-756-36-4
Butvilas E.
Nikles J.
3-67-656-1
Durasovic V.
Machac T.[1]
6-37-65
Fatic N.[6]
Decamps G.
6-47-5
Bellucci M.
Marie J.
6-47-60
Kolar Z.
Poljak D.
6-766-27-5
Added D.
Rosenkranz M.
6-46-4
Lajal M.
Atmane T.
7-666-1
Travaglia S.
Serdarusic N.
6-37-63
Berankis R.[2]
Sabaliauskas A.
6-46-2
Escoffier A.[8]
Gaubas V.
6-16-3
Marchenko I.
Basic M.
7-56-2