Dan Added vs Lukas Klein — Vilnius CH Quarter-final

Vilnius CH · CHALLENGER · Quarter-final
Dan Added
FRA
Dan Added
#243ATP
1418ELO
1402Hard ELO
27 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLLLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 17 October 2022
hard
Lukas Klein
SVK5
Lukas Klein
#185ATP
1601ELO
1535Hard ELO
$64kYTD
$1.3MCAREER
28 yrs · 193 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLWWWWLW
Added D.
7-5 6-3
Klein L.
Added D.
762
Klein L.
530

Dan Added defeated Lukas Klein 7-5 6-3 in the Vilnius CH quarter-final on hard.

Key context

  • Match story: Dan Added closed it out in two sets, 7–5 6–3.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Added D.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Klein L.

Klein L.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Added D.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Added D.Klein L.
1st serve in·Slight edge
58%
66%
1st serve points won·Even
70%
72%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
52%
Service points won·Even
62%
65%
Return points won·Even
38%
37%
Break points saved·Even
61%
63%
Aces / match·Slight edge
4.8
5.6
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.0
3.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (161 vs 199). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Added D.Klein L.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
21
39
Break points saved·Slight edge
81
92
Break points won·Slight edge
9
1
Deciding sets·Dominant
31
63
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
14
31

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Added D.
5.6
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Klein L.
6.8
Slight advantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
3.5Hard Elo 1402
Surface ELO
6.5+133 Hard Elo edge
3.0Overall Elo 1418
ELO gap
7.0Overall Elo 1601
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
4.5
Surface form
3.6
0.0Lost last 2
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
Minutes 14d
3.8
3-set count
4.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Bellucci M.
Ilkel C.
1-66-37-5
Semi-finals
Ilkel C.
Added D.
7-636-4
Bellucci M.
Durasovic V.
6-46-4
Quarter-finals
Added D.
Klein L.[5]
7-56-3
Durasovic V.
Escoffier A.[8]
6-16-1
Bellucci M.
Kolar Z.
6-16-3
Ilkel C.
Lokoli L.[7]
7-56-3
R16
Kolar Z.
Mager G.[4]
7-686-4
Bellucci M.
Fatic N.[6]
7-656-3
Durasovic V.
Marchenko I.
5-77-646-1
Ilkel C.
Valkusz M.
7-616-726-1
Lokoli L.[7]
Lajal M.
1-66-36-0
Added D.
Berankis R.[2]
7-57-65
Escoffier A.[8]
Butvilas E.
6-07-66
Klein L.[5]
Travaglia S.
6-07-5
R32
Klein L.[5]
Gray A.
6-33-67-63
Ilkel C.
Arnaldi M.[3]
6-36-2
Valkusz M.
Gulbis E.
6-26-3
Lokoli L.[7]
Ramanathan R.
6-16-4
Mager G.[4]
Janvier M.
6-756-36-4
Butvilas E.
Nikles J.
3-67-656-1
Durasovic V.
Machac T.[1]
6-37-65
Fatic N.[6]
Decamps G.
6-47-5
Bellucci M.
Marie J.
6-47-60
Kolar Z.
Poljak D.
6-766-27-5
Added D.
Rosenkranz M.
6-46-4
Lajal M.
Atmane T.
7-666-1
Travaglia S.
Serdarusic N.
6-37-63
Berankis R.[2]
Sabaliauskas A.
6-46-2
Escoffier A.[8]
Gaubas V.
6-16-3
Marchenko I.
Basic M.
7-56-2